Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis
Eighty-six male light lambs of Manchego breed were used in this study. Principal component (PC) analysis was performed to study the relationship between carcass quality variables (n=22) and between meat quality measures (n=21). The carcass quality was assessed using objective and subjective measurements of conformation and fatness besides the joints proportion and tissues proportion of the leg. The measurements used to evaluate meat quality were pH in longissimus dorsi and semitendinosus muscles, the colour, moisture, water holding capacity, cooking losses, texture and sensorial analysis on longissimus dorsi. The five first PCs explained about 77% of the total variability for carcass measures whereas for meat quality the 74% of the total variability was explained for the eight first PCs. All the carcass measurements showed similar weight to define the first PC, whereas the muscle and bone proportion as well as musclebone ratio of the leg were useful to define the second PC. The meat quality measures that were more effective to define the first PC were the meat colour measurements, whereas the sensorial variables defined the second PC. The projection of the carcass quality data in the first two PCs allowed to distinguish clearly between heavier carcasses (higher than 6.5 kg) and lighter carcasses (lower than 5.5 kg). The carcasses with a weight higher than 6.5 kg were on the left side of the figure, where the variables of conformation and fatness lie. The group of medium carcass weight were placed between the two previous groups. The projection of the meat quality data in the first two PCs did not differ between hot carcass weights, although there was a trend, the lighter carcasses lay on the left side of the graph, which implies small differences between meat quality in this range of carcass weight. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | journal article biblioteca |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
2004
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/5717 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
dig-inia-es-20.500.12792-5717 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
koha |
| spelling |
dig-inia-es-20.500.12792-57172020-12-15T09:48:02Z Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis Cañeque, V. Pérez, C. Velasco, S. Díaz, M. T. Lauzurica, S. Álvarez, I. Ruiz De Huidobro, F. Onega, E. De la Fuente, J. Eighty-six male light lambs of Manchego breed were used in this study. Principal component (PC) analysis was performed to study the relationship between carcass quality variables (n=22) and between meat quality measures (n=21). The carcass quality was assessed using objective and subjective measurements of conformation and fatness besides the joints proportion and tissues proportion of the leg. The measurements used to evaluate meat quality were pH in longissimus dorsi and semitendinosus muscles, the colour, moisture, water holding capacity, cooking losses, texture and sensorial analysis on longissimus dorsi. The five first PCs explained about 77% of the total variability for carcass measures whereas for meat quality the 74% of the total variability was explained for the eight first PCs. All the carcass measurements showed similar weight to define the first PC, whereas the muscle and bone proportion as well as musclebone ratio of the leg were useful to define the second PC. The meat quality measures that were more effective to define the first PC were the meat colour measurements, whereas the sensorial variables defined the second PC. The projection of the carcass quality data in the first two PCs allowed to distinguish clearly between heavier carcasses (higher than 6.5 kg) and lighter carcasses (lower than 5.5 kg). The carcasses with a weight higher than 6.5 kg were on the left side of the figure, where the variables of conformation and fatness lie. The group of medium carcass weight were placed between the two previous groups. The projection of the meat quality data in the first two PCs did not differ between hot carcass weights, although there was a trend, the lighter carcasses lay on the left side of the graph, which implies small differences between meat quality in this range of carcass weight. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2020-10-22T21:00:19Z 2020-10-22T21:00:19Z 2004 journal article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/5717 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.01.002 eng Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ open access |
| institution |
INIA ES |
| collection |
DSpace |
| country |
España |
| countrycode |
ES |
| component |
Bibliográfico |
| access |
En linea |
| databasecode |
dig-inia-es |
| tag |
biblioteca |
| region |
Europa del Sur |
| libraryname |
Biblioteca del INIA España |
| language |
eng |
| description |
Eighty-six male light lambs of Manchego breed were used in this study. Principal component (PC) analysis was performed to study the relationship between carcass quality variables (n=22) and between meat quality measures (n=21). The carcass quality was assessed using objective and subjective measurements of conformation and fatness besides the joints proportion and tissues proportion of the leg. The measurements used to evaluate meat quality were pH in longissimus dorsi and semitendinosus muscles, the colour, moisture, water holding capacity, cooking losses, texture and sensorial analysis on longissimus dorsi. The five first PCs explained about 77% of the total variability for carcass measures whereas for meat quality the 74% of the total variability was explained for the eight first PCs. All the carcass measurements showed similar weight to define the first PC, whereas the muscle and bone proportion as well as musclebone ratio of the leg were useful to define the second PC. The meat quality measures that were more effective to define the first PC were the meat colour measurements, whereas the sensorial variables defined the second PC. The projection of the carcass quality data in the first two PCs allowed to distinguish clearly between heavier carcasses (higher than 6.5 kg) and lighter carcasses (lower than 5.5 kg). The carcasses with a weight higher than 6.5 kg were on the left side of the figure, where the variables of conformation and fatness lie. The group of medium carcass weight were placed between the two previous groups. The projection of the meat quality data in the first two PCs did not differ between hot carcass weights, although there was a trend, the lighter carcasses lay on the left side of the graph, which implies small differences between meat quality in this range of carcass weight. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| format |
journal article |
| author |
Cañeque, V. Pérez, C. Velasco, S. Díaz, M. T. Lauzurica, S. Álvarez, I. Ruiz De Huidobro, F. Onega, E. De la Fuente, J. |
| spellingShingle |
Cañeque, V. Pérez, C. Velasco, S. Díaz, M. T. Lauzurica, S. Álvarez, I. Ruiz De Huidobro, F. Onega, E. De la Fuente, J. Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis |
| author_facet |
Cañeque, V. Pérez, C. Velasco, S. Díaz, M. T. Lauzurica, S. Álvarez, I. Ruiz De Huidobro, F. Onega, E. De la Fuente, J. |
| author_sort |
Cañeque, V. |
| title |
Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis |
| title_short |
Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis |
| title_full |
Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis |
| title_fullStr |
Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis |
| title_sort |
carcass and meat quality of light lambs using principal component analysis |
| publishDate |
2004 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/5717 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT canequev carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT perezc carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT velascos carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT diazmt carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT lauzuricas carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT alvarezi carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT ruizdehuidobrof carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT onegae carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT delafuentej carcassandmeatqualityoflightlambsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis |
| _version_ |
1758005072603643904 |