Sources, levels and methods of potassium application in soil

A field experiment was carried out on a Red-Yellow Podzolic (Palendult) soil from the Itapoã soil mapping unit at Viamão, RS, Brazil, in 1981/82. to determine the efficiency of K sources (KCl, K2SO4 and  KAISiO4 (kalsilite), the methods of application (broadcast with incorporation, in rows, and broadcast on the soil surface) and doses of zero, 150 and 300 kg/ha of K, on dry matter production and K uptake by millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke) plants. There was neither effect of sources nor off methods of K application on dry matter production. The effect of K was significant up to the rate of 150kg/ha and 300kg/ha of K, respectively, on dry matter production and K uptake. Methods of application did not show any effect on the K absorption by millet. K absorption was higher when KCl was applied, in comparison with kalsilite application, while K2SO4 showed intermediate and nonsignificant values between these two sources.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanzonowicz, Cláudio, Mielniczuk, João
Format: Digital revista
Language:por
Published: Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 2014
Online Access:https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15049
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A field experiment was carried out on a Red-Yellow Podzolic (Palendult) soil from the Itapoã soil mapping unit at Viamão, RS, Brazil, in 1981/82. to determine the efficiency of K sources (KCl, K2SO4 and  KAISiO4 (kalsilite), the methods of application (broadcast with incorporation, in rows, and broadcast on the soil surface) and doses of zero, 150 and 300 kg/ha of K, on dry matter production and K uptake by millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke) plants. There was neither effect of sources nor off methods of K application on dry matter production. The effect of K was significant up to the rate of 150kg/ha and 300kg/ha of K, respectively, on dry matter production and K uptake. Methods of application did not show any effect on the K absorption by millet. K absorption was higher when KCl was applied, in comparison with kalsilite application, while K2SO4 showed intermediate and nonsignificant values between these two sources.