Elevation models for obtaining terrain attributes used in digital soil mapping
The objective of this work was to evaluate digital elevation models (DEM) obtained by different data sources and to select one of them for deriving morphometric variables used in digital soil mapping. The work was performed in the Guapi‑Macacu river basin, RJ, Brazil. The primary data used in the models generated by interpolation (DEM map and DEM hybrid) were: contour lines, drainage, elevation points, and remote sensor data transformed into points. The obtained models by remote sensing and aero‑restitution (DEM SRTM and DEM IBGE) were used in the comparison. All models showed spatial resolution of 30 m. The elevation model evaluations were based on: the terrain derived attribute analysis (slope, aspect, and curvature); spurious depressions (sink); comparison between features derived from the models and the original ones originated from planialtimetric maps; and the analysis of derived watersheds. The DEM hybrid showed a superior quality than the other models.
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Digital revista |
| Language: | por |
| Published: |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
2012
|
| Online Access: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/11091 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The objective of this work was to evaluate digital elevation models (DEM) obtained by different data sources and to select one of them for deriving morphometric variables used in digital soil mapping. The work was performed in the Guapi‑Macacu river basin, RJ, Brazil. The primary data used in the models generated by interpolation (DEM map and DEM hybrid) were: contour lines, drainage, elevation points, and remote sensor data transformed into points. The obtained models by remote sensing and aero‑restitution (DEM SRTM and DEM IBGE) were used in the comparison. All models showed spatial resolution of 30 m. The elevation model evaluations were based on: the terrain derived attribute analysis (slope, aspect, and curvature); spurious depressions (sink); comparison between features derived from the models and the original ones originated from planialtimetric maps; and the analysis of derived watersheds. The DEM hybrid showed a superior quality than the other models. |
|---|