Canal transportation and centering ability of curved root canals prepared using rotary and reciprocating systems
Abstract Aim: To evaluate canal transportation and centering ability of Protaper and WaveOne systems in curved root canals by cone-beam computed tomography. Methods: Twenty human molars were randomly divided into two groups according to the system used: Group GP (ProTaper Universal(r)) and group GW (WaveOne(tm)). CT scans were performed before and after the chemo-mechanical preparation on three points: 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm from the tooth apex. The cuttings in dentin were measured and results were statistically analyzed. Results: In GP, there was higher percentage in transport at 2 mm and 4 mm toward the mesial wall of the tooth root compared to GW (p<0.05). There was no difference between the systems regarding their centering ability. Conclusions: None of the systems was able to touch all the dentin walls and stay centered during the chemical-mechanical preparation.
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Digital revista |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP
2015
|
| Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000300214 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Aim: To evaluate canal transportation and centering ability of Protaper and WaveOne systems in curved root canals by cone-beam computed tomography. Methods: Twenty human molars were randomly divided into two groups according to the system used: Group GP (ProTaper Universal(r)) and group GW (WaveOne(tm)). CT scans were performed before and after the chemo-mechanical preparation on three points: 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm from the tooth apex. The cuttings in dentin were measured and results were statistically analyzed. Results: In GP, there was higher percentage in transport at 2 mm and 4 mm toward the mesial wall of the tooth root compared to GW (p<0.05). There was no difference between the systems regarding their centering ability. Conclusions: None of the systems was able to touch all the dentin walls and stay centered during the chemical-mechanical preparation. |
|---|