Perceptual filling-in of stereoscopically presented targets

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of parametric variation on the filling-in latency of stereoscopically presented stimuli. METHODS: Anaglyphs were created using two circular patches of 0.3º diameter, 0.5º disparity and 6º eccentricity from fixation point. Targets were presented at the visual field midline, 90º and 270º positions, with crossed and uncrossed disparity. The time elapsed for disappearance of the target under voluntary steady fixation was computed. Eighteen subjects tested. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between crossed and uncrossed disparities, nor between near or far from the vertical horopter line. The significant difference was between upper and lower visual field positions. CONCLUSION: The results show that: (i) stereoscopic presentation does not influence the target filling-in latency; (ii) differences between dorsal and ventral visual stream might influence target filling-in latency.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Couto,Márcia Furukawa, Pessoa,Valdir Filgueiras
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia 2007
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492007000100018
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of parametric variation on the filling-in latency of stereoscopically presented stimuli. METHODS: Anaglyphs were created using two circular patches of 0.3º diameter, 0.5º disparity and 6º eccentricity from fixation point. Targets were presented at the visual field midline, 90º and 270º positions, with crossed and uncrossed disparity. The time elapsed for disappearance of the target under voluntary steady fixation was computed. Eighteen subjects tested. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between crossed and uncrossed disparities, nor between near or far from the vertical horopter line. The significant difference was between upper and lower visual field positions. CONCLUSION: The results show that: (i) stereoscopic presentation does not influence the target filling-in latency; (ii) differences between dorsal and ventral visual stream might influence target filling-in latency.