Rural politics in Kirchnerism. Coexistence or agribusiness predominance?
This article examines the “neo-developmental perspective” towards agriculture, compared to the previous period. The aim is to recognized the prevailing trends and key policy approaches in the sector, between 2003-2015. First, it characterizes the accumulation pattern, iniciated by the end of convertibility. Then, it analyzes the rural policy, especially observing a governmental plan (PEA 2020) and its sustainability dimension. Thu, through the study of rural policies, we hope to contribute to the discussion on development and sustainability in actual Argentina.
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Digital revista |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
Centro de Historia Argentina y Americana
2017
|
| Online Access: | https://www.mundoagrario.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/MAe045 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This article examines the “neo-developmental perspective” towards agriculture, compared to the previous period. The aim is to recognized the prevailing trends and key policy approaches in the sector, between 2003-2015. First, it characterizes the accumulation pattern, iniciated by the end of convertibility. Then, it analyzes the rural policy, especially observing a governmental plan (PEA 2020) and its sustainability dimension. Thu, through the study of rural policies, we hope to contribute to the discussion on development and sustainability in actual Argentina. |
|---|