A comparison of high‑throughput plasma NMR protocols for comparative untargeted metabolomics (Metabolomics
Following publication of the original article, the authors would like to correct a sentence in the paragraph “1H-NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K…” under the heading “NMR experiments”. The sentence currently reads: “The LED pulse sequence had the form -RD-901-G1- 1801-G1-901-G2-T-901-G1-1801-G1-901-G2-t-901-acquire FID, where RD is a relaxation delay, 901 is a 901 RF pulse, G1 is the pulsed-field gradient that is applied to allow editing, 1801 is a 1801 RF pulse, G2 is a spoil gradient applied to remove unwanted magnetization components. The diffusion delay Δ is the time during which the molecules are allowed to diffuse—this is the period (901-G1-1801-G1- 901-G2-T-); and t is a delay to allow the longitudinal eddy currents caused within the sample to decay (Beckonert et al. 2007).” The sentence should read: “The LED pulse sequence had the form -RD-90°-G1- 180°-G1-90°-G2-T-90°-G1-180°-G1-90°-G2-t-90°-acquire FID, where RD is a relaxation delay, 90° is a 90° RF pulse, G1 is the pulsed-field gradient that is applied to allow editing, 180° is a 180° RF pulse, G2 is a spoil gradient applied to remove unwanted magnetization components. The diffusion delay ? is the time during which the molecules are allowed to diffuse—this is the period (90°-G1-180°-G1-90°-G2 T-); and t is a delay to allow the longitudinal eddy currents caused within the sample to decay (Beckonert et al. 2007).” This has been corrected with this erratum.
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article/Letter to editor biblioteca |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | Life Science, |
| Online Access: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/a-comparison-of-highthroughput-plasma-nmr-protocols-for-comparati |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Following publication of the original article, the authors would like to correct a sentence in the paragraph “1H-NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K…” under the heading “NMR experiments”. The sentence currently reads: “The LED pulse sequence had the form -RD-901-G1- 1801-G1-901-G2-T-901-G1-1801-G1-901-G2-t-901-acquire FID, where RD is a relaxation delay, 901 is a 901 RF pulse, G1 is the pulsed-field gradient that is applied to allow editing, 1801 is a 1801 RF pulse, G2 is a spoil gradient applied to remove unwanted magnetization components. The diffusion delay Δ is the time during which the molecules are allowed to diffuse—this is the period (901-G1-1801-G1- 901-G2-T-); and t is a delay to allow the longitudinal eddy currents caused within the sample to decay (Beckonert et al. 2007).” The sentence should read: “The LED pulse sequence had the form -RD-90°-G1- 180°-G1-90°-G2-T-90°-G1-180°-G1-90°-G2-t-90°-acquire FID, where RD is a relaxation delay, 90° is a 90° RF pulse, G1 is the pulsed-field gradient that is applied to allow editing, 180° is a 180° RF pulse, G2 is a spoil gradient applied to remove unwanted magnetization components. The diffusion delay ? is the time during which the molecules are allowed to diffuse—this is the period (90°-G1-180°-G1-90°-G2 T-); and t is a delay to allow the longitudinal eddy currents caused within the sample to decay (Beckonert et al. 2007).” This has been corrected with this erratum. |
|---|