Sustaining Urban Growth through Innovative Capacity : Beijing and Shanghai in Comparison

The authors examine the diverse prospects of innovative sectors in Beijing and Shanghai using available indicators and data collected for this study through surveys. Beijing is the first choice for companies locating in China, but foreign employees prefer Shanghai for living convenience and cultural amenities. While Shanghai lags behind Beijing in knowledge creation and the generation of startup companies in the innovative sectors, it takes the lead in the commercialization of technological innovations and the development of creative cultural industries. The municipal authorities of Beijing and Shanghai have improved the innovation environment of the cities, but certain elements still stunt the growth of innovative industries, which cannot be removed easily. Three kinds of knowledge-intensive enterprises included in innovative sectors in the survey are high-tech manufacturers, knowledge-intensive business services, and creative content providers. The survey found that the clustering of the firms arose from the attraction of preferential policies and the purchase by governments or state-owned enterprises of information technology products. The survey shows that interaction among firms is inadequate in the knowledge-based industrial clusters in both Beijing and Shanghai. Hence, it may be some time before clustering leads to substantial gains in collective efficiency for innovative industry in Beijing and Shanghai.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jici, Wang, Xin, Tong
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2005-03
Subjects:AIR, AIR QUALITY, ANNUAL REPORT, BANKS, BI, BUREAUCRACY, BUSINESS SECTORS, BUSINESS SERVICES, CENTRAL PLANNING, CITIES, CLIMATE, COLLABORATION, COLOR TV, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, CONTENT PROVIDERS, DISPOSABLE INCOME, ECOLOGY, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, EMPLOYMENT, ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, FAMILIES, FISHING, HEALTH CARE, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, INFORMATION SERVICES, INNOVATION, INTERACTIVE MEDIA, INTERMEDIARIES, IRON, KEY INDUSTRIES, KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, KNOWLEDGE WORKERS, LABOR FORCE, LAWS, LEARNING, LEISURE, LEISURE TIME, LIVING CONDITIONS, MARKETING, MASS MEDIA, MEDIA, MEDICINES, OIL, OUTSOURCING, PATENTS, PERFORMING ARTS, PHONES, POLICY MAKERS, POLICY RESEARCH, POLLUTION, PRIVATE SECTOR, PRODUCERS, PRODUCTIVITY, PROGRAMS, PROPERTY RIGHTS, PUBLIC POLICY, PUBLIC SERVICES, RADIO, RESEARCH CENTERS, RESEARCH FINDINGS, RESEARCH SECTOR, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, SCREENING, SERVICE PROVIDERS, SOCIAL SCIENCES, SOFTWARE COMPANIES, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, SOFTWARE INDUSTRY, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, TAXATION, TECHNICIANS, TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS, TELECOMMUNICATION, TELECOMMUNICATION SECTOR, TELECOMS, TELECOMS INDUSTRY, TRANSPARENCY, TRANSPORTATION, ZONING,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/03/5687899/sustaining-urban-growth-through-innovative-capacity-beijing-shanghai-comparison
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/8974
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors examine the diverse prospects of innovative sectors in Beijing and Shanghai using available indicators and data collected for this study through surveys. Beijing is the first choice for companies locating in China, but foreign employees prefer Shanghai for living convenience and cultural amenities. While Shanghai lags behind Beijing in knowledge creation and the generation of startup companies in the innovative sectors, it takes the lead in the commercialization of technological innovations and the development of creative cultural industries. The municipal authorities of Beijing and Shanghai have improved the innovation environment of the cities, but certain elements still stunt the growth of innovative industries, which cannot be removed easily. Three kinds of knowledge-intensive enterprises included in innovative sectors in the survey are high-tech manufacturers, knowledge-intensive business services, and creative content providers. The survey found that the clustering of the firms arose from the attraction of preferential policies and the purchase by governments or state-owned enterprises of information technology products. The survey shows that interaction among firms is inadequate in the knowledge-based industrial clusters in both Beijing and Shanghai. Hence, it may be some time before clustering leads to substantial gains in collective efficiency for innovative industry in Beijing and Shanghai.