Challenges to MDG Achievement in Low Income Countries : Lessons from Ghana and Honduras
This paper summarizes the policy lessons from applications of the Maquette for MDG Simulations (MAMS) model to two low income countries: Ghana and Honduras. Results show that costs of MDGs achievement could reach 10-13 percent of GDP by 2015, although, given the observed low productivity in the provision of social services, significant savings may be realized by improving efficiency. Sources of financing also matter: foreign aid inflows can reduce international competitiveness through real exchange appreciation, while domestic financing can crowd out the private sector and slow poverty reduction. Spending a large share of a fixed budget on growth-enhancing infrastructure may mean sacrificing some human development, even if higher growth is usually associated with lower costs of social services. The pursuit of MDGs increases demand for skills: while this encourages higher educational attainments, in the short term this could lead to increased income inequality and a lower poverty elasticity of growth.
Summary: | This paper summarizes the policy lessons
from applications of the Maquette for MDG Simulations (MAMS)
model to two low income countries: Ghana and Honduras.
Results show that costs of MDGs achievement could reach
10-13 percent of GDP by 2015, although, given the observed
low productivity in the provision of social services,
significant savings may be realized by improving efficiency.
Sources of financing also matter: foreign aid inflows can
reduce international competitiveness through real exchange
appreciation, while domestic financing can crowd out the
private sector and slow poverty reduction. Spending a large
share of a fixed budget on growth-enhancing infrastructure
may mean sacrificing some human development, even if higher
growth is usually associated with lower costs of social
services. The pursuit of MDGs increases demand for skills:
while this encourages higher educational attainments, in the
short term this could lead to increased income inequality
and a lower poverty elasticity of growth. |
---|