Sunk Costs, Market Contestability, and the Size Distribution of Firms

In this paper we offer a new economic explanation for the observed inter-industry differences in the size distribution of firms. Our empirical estimates based on three temporal (1982, 1987, and 1992) cross-sections of the four-digit US manufacturing industries indicate that increased market contestability, as signified by low sunk costs, tends to reduce the dispersion of firm sizes. These findings provide support for one of the key predictions of the theory of contestable markets: that market forces under contestability would tend to render any inefficient organization of the industry unsustainable and, consequently, tighten the distribution of firms around the optimum.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kessides, Ioannis N., Tang, Li
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:EN
Published: 2010
Subjects:Production, Pricing, and Market Structure, Size Distribution of Firms L110, Industry Studies: Manufacturing: General L600,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4622
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper we offer a new economic explanation for the observed inter-industry differences in the size distribution of firms. Our empirical estimates based on three temporal (1982, 1987, and 1992) cross-sections of the four-digit US manufacturing industries indicate that increased market contestability, as signified by low sunk costs, tends to reduce the dispersion of firm sizes. These findings provide support for one of the key predictions of the theory of contestable markets: that market forces under contestability would tend to render any inefficient organization of the industry unsustainable and, consequently, tighten the distribution of firms around the optimum.