Re-evaluating Microfinance

We evaluate effectiveness of microfinance using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method applied to data collected in a recent randomized control trial. This method allows us to answer an additional set of questions not answered by the original study and provide more nuanced evidence by comparing Microfinance Institution (MFI) borrowers to those without any loans and those with prior loans from other sources. We argue that this unique setting with two comparison groups allows us to shed light on the unobservable entrepreneurial spirit bias and provides upper and lower bounds on the true microfinance impact. Our results suggest that microfinance can make a modest difference for some households in several expenditure categories.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cintina, Inna, Love, Inessa
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Published: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank 2019-02
Subjects:MICROFINANCE, POVERTY, PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/34290
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We evaluate effectiveness of microfinance using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method applied to data collected in a recent randomized control trial. This method allows us to answer an additional set of questions not answered by the original study and provide more nuanced evidence by comparing Microfinance Institution (MFI) borrowers to those without any loans and those with prior loans from other sources. We argue that this unique setting with two comparison groups allows us to shed light on the unobservable entrepreneurial spirit bias and provides upper and lower bounds on the true microfinance impact. Our results suggest that microfinance can make a modest difference for some households in several expenditure categories.