Revisiting the Relevance of the World Bank's Country Policy and Institutional Assessment on Economic Growth
We revisit the relevance of the World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA)against growth performance, with attention to possible biases arising from qualitative andquantitative changes in the CPIA methodology. The CPIA, introduced in the late 1970s, had aseries of extensive revisions in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, placing more emphasis oninstitutional capacity and social policies. We reexamine a claim by previous studies that the CPIAis weakly relevant for economic performance, by running cross-country growth regressions with apanel dataset covering 146 countries between 1995 and 2015, a period over which the CPIA iscomparable. By addressing the possible biases arising from the methodological changes, we showthat the CPIA is a good predictor for future growth.
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2018-12-01
|
Subjects: | COUNTRY POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT, CPIA, ECONOMIC GROWTH, SOCIAL POLICY, EMPIRICAL STUDY, |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/342391544127883339/Revisiting-the-Relevance-of-the-World-Banks-Country-Policy-and-Institutional-Assessment-CPIA-on-Economic-Growth https://hdl.handle.net/10986/31060 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We revisit the relevance of the World
Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment
(CPIA)against growth performance, with attention to possible
biases arising from qualitative andquantitative changes in
the CPIA methodology. The CPIA, introduced in the late
1970s, had aseries of extensive revisions in the late 1980s
and the early 1990s, placing more emphasis oninstitutional
capacity and social policies. We reexamine a claim by
previous studies that the CPIAis weakly relevant for
economic performance, by running cross-country growth
regressions with apanel dataset covering 146 countries
between 1995 and 2015, a period over which the CPIA
iscomparable. By addressing the possible biases arising from
the methodological changes, we showthat the CPIA is a good
predictor for future growth. |
---|