The Uganda Poverty Assessment Report 2016

Uganda’s progress in reducing poverty from 1993 to 2006 is a remarkable story of success that has been well told. The narrative of Uganda’s continued, albeit it slightly slower, progress in reducing poverty since 2006 is less familiar. This was a period in which growth slowed as the gains from reforms years earlier had been fully realized, and weak infrastructure and increasing corruption increasingly constrained private sector competitiveness (World Bank 2015). This report examines Uganda’s progress in reducing poverty, with a specific focus on the period 2006 to 2013. The report shows that high growth from 2006 to 2010 benefited poverty reduction. Before turning in further detail to the key findings of the report, it is important to note that the analysis undertaken in this report is only possible because the Government of Uganda has invested in a high quality series of household surveys to document progress in wellbeing since 1993. The Uganda Bureau of Statistics has conducted high-quality household surveys that every three to four years that have provided a comparable series of data on poverty and other household characteristics for the last twenty years. Uganda is one of the few countries in the region to have achieved this level of comparable, frequent poverty monitoring over time. Without this, it would not be possible to document the lessons Uganda provides.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Report biblioteca
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2016-09
Subjects:SANITATION, PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION, POVERTY POVERTY, SAFETY NET PROGRAMS, RISKS, FOOD NEEDS, HOUSEHOLD SIZE, HOUSEHOLD SURVEY, AGRICULTURAL GROWTH, POVERTY LINE, LAND REFORM, IMPACT ON POVERTY, ECONOMIC GROWTH, POOR COMMUNITIES, RURAL URBAN NATIONAL, RURAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, POVERTY LEVELS, INCOME POVERTY, FOOD CONSUMPTION, INCOME, FORMAL SAFETY NETS, POVERTY RATES, POVERTY ESTIMATES, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, NATIONAL POVERTY LINE, LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION, SAVINGS ACCOUNTS, COUNTERFACTUAL, NUTRITION OUTCOMES, RURAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION, POLITICAL ECONOMY, DEATH, FOOD POLICY, NATIONAL POVERTY, AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION, POOR PEOPLE, EXTREME POVERTY LINE, INCOME SUPPORT, FARM INCOME, LIVESTOCK INCOME, SOCIAL PROGRAMS, RURAL POPULATION, CONFLICT, MEASURES, POVERTY MEASURES, NATIONAL POVERTY LINES, HOUSEHOLD DEMOGRAPHICS, INCOME EARNING POTENTIAL, SAFETY NETS, POVERTY REDUCTION, AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES, AGRICULTURAL WAGE, FOOD MARKETS, RURAL POPULATIONS, SAVINGS, CROP PRODUCTION, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, INCIDENCE ANALYSIS, AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES, FOOD BASKET, RURAL HOUSEHOLDS, FOOD POVERTY LINE, HOUSEHOLD HEAD, RURAL INCOME, POVERTY GAP, AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, POVERTY REDUCING, INCOME GROWTH, FARM EMPLOYMENT, VILLAGE ECONOMIES, POVERTY INCIDENCE, TRANSFERS, POOR AREAS, PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT, INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE, AGRICULTURAL WAGES, HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, POVERTY STATUS, EMPLOYMENT INCOME, HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS, LAND OWNERSHIP, FOOD EXPENDITURES, SOCIAL SECURITY, FARMERS, POOR” HOUSEHOLDS, RURAL VILLAGES, CASH TRANSFERS, BETTER ACCESS TO MARKETS, RURAL MIGRANTS, HOUSEHOLD HEADS, FOOD PRODUCTION, FOOD ITEMS, PUBLIC SAFETY NETS, NUTRITIONAL STATUS, UNEMPLOYMENT, POVERTY LINES, HUMAN CAPITAL, POVERTY INDEX, CHRONIC MALNUTRITION, RURAL MIGRATION, DROUGHT, FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS, FOOD POVERTY, FARM INCOME GROWTH, RURAL AREA, REMOTE RURAL AREAS, FARM ACTIVITIES, AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT, FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, RURAL POVERTY, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, FOOD GOODS, AGRICULTURAL SECTOR, FOOD EXPENDITURE, IMPACT OF SHOCKS, SMALLHOLDER FARMERS, MALNUTRITION, RURAL, CHILD NUTRITION, FARM WORK, NUTRITION, LAND SIZE, ACCESS TO MARKETS, POVERTY SEVERITY, PRIVATE TRANSFERS, AGRICULTURAL INPUTS, SCHOOL FEEDING, FARM INCOMES, EMPLOYMENT IN AGRICULTURE, CHILD MORTALITY, INSURANCE, FEMALE FARMERS, TARGETING, POVERTY INDICATORS, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, CONSUMPTION SMOOTHING, FOOD SHARE, DRINKING WATER, WAR, EXTREME POVERTY, IRRIGATION, LACK OF KNOWLEDGE, FOOD CROPS, FARM SELF-EMPLOYMENT, ACCESS TO SERVICES, RURAL AREAS, POVERTY, POOR FARMERS, AGRICULTURAL INCOMES, FEEDING PROGRAMS, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE, HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, INFORMAL INSURANCE, SCHOOL FEEDING PROGRAMS, INFORMAL TRANSFERS, RURAL ELECTRIFICATION, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY, RURAL TRANSFORMATION, SUSTAINABLE POVERTY REDUCTION, HOUSEHOLD WELFARE, POOR, POVERTY ASSESSMENT, LACK OF INFORMATION, FOOD PRICES, PUBLIC SPENDING, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, INDICATORS OF POVERTY, LAND MANAGEMENT, CROP INCOME, INFORMAL INSURANCE MECHANISMS, RURAL POVERTY REDUCTION, POVERTY ANALYSIS, POVERTY ALLEVIATION, HOUSEHOLD LIVING STANDARDS, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INCOME VOLATILITY, INEQUALITY, POOR HOUSEHOLDS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/694751474349535432/Main-report
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/26075
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Uganda’s progress in reducing poverty from 1993 to 2006 is a remarkable story of success that has been well told. The narrative of Uganda’s continued, albeit it slightly slower, progress in reducing poverty since 2006 is less familiar. This was a period in which growth slowed as the gains from reforms years earlier had been fully realized, and weak infrastructure and increasing corruption increasingly constrained private sector competitiveness (World Bank 2015). This report examines Uganda’s progress in reducing poverty, with a specific focus on the period 2006 to 2013. The report shows that high growth from 2006 to 2010 benefited poverty reduction. Before turning in further detail to the key findings of the report, it is important to note that the analysis undertaken in this report is only possible because the Government of Uganda has invested in a high quality series of household surveys to document progress in wellbeing since 1993. The Uganda Bureau of Statistics has conducted high-quality household surveys that every three to four years that have provided a comparable series of data on poverty and other household characteristics for the last twenty years. Uganda is one of the few countries in the region to have achieved this level of comparable, frequent poverty monitoring over time. Without this, it would not be possible to document the lessons Uganda provides.