Confronting the Food-Energy-Environment Trilemma : Global Land Use in the Long Run

Economic, agronomic, and biophysical drivers affect global land use, so all three influences need to be considered in evaluating economically optimal allocations of the world's land resources. A dynamic, forward-looking optimization framework applied over the course of the coming century shows that although some deforestation is optimal in the near term, in the absence of climate change regulation, the desirability of further deforestation is eliminated by mid-century. Although adverse productivity shocks from climate change have a modest effect on global land use, such shocks combined with rapid growth in energy prices lead to significant deforestation and higher greenhouse gas emissions than in the baseline. Imposition of a global greenhouse gas emissions constraint further heightens the competition for land, as fertilizer use declines and land-based mitigation strategies expand. However, anticipation of the constraint largely dilutes its environmental effectiveness, as deforestation accelerates prior to imposition of the target.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steinbuks, Jevgenijs, Hertel, Thomas W.
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2014-06
Subjects:AEROSOLS, AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, ALLOCATION, ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS, ANNUAL ENERGY OUTLOOK, ANNUAL NET FLUX OF CARBON, ANTHROPOGENIC CARBON EMISSIONS, ATMOSPHERE, ATMOSPHERIC CARBON, BASELINE LEVELS, BEQUEST VALUE, BIO-ENERGY, BIOMASS, BIOMASS BURNING, CALCULATION, CAPITAL ADJUSTMENT, CAPS, CARBON, CARBON DIOXIDE, CARBON LEAKAGE, CARBON PRICES, CARBON SEQUESTRATION, CARBON STOCK, CARBON STOCKS, CARBON TAXES, CHANGES IN LAND USE, CL, CLEAN ENERGY, CLIMATE, CLIMATE CHANGE, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS, CLIMATE POLICIES, CLIMATE POLICY, CO2, COMBUSTION, CONSUMER DEMAND, COST OF PRODUCTION, DEBT, DECISION MAKING, DEFORESTATION, DEFORESTATION RATE, DEFORESTATION RATES, DEGRADED LANDS, DEGREE DAYS, DEMAND FOR ENERGY, DEMAND FOR ENERGY SERVICES, DIESEL, DISCOUNT RATE, DYNAMIC MODEL, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, ECONOMIC MODELS, ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE, ECONOMIC THEORY, ECONOMICS, ECOSYSTEM, ECOSYSTEMS, ELASTICITIES, ELASTICITY OF SUBSTITUTION, ELECTRIC POWER, ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR, EMISSION, EMISSIONS ABATEMENT, EMISSIONS CONTROL, EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION, EMISSIONS FROM LAND USE, EMISSIONS FROM LAND USE CHANGE, EMISSIONS FROM LIVESTOCK, EMISSIONS FROM PETROLEUM, EMISSIONS INTENSITY, ENERGY CONSUMPTION, ENERGY COSTS, ENERGY DEMAND, ENERGY ECONOMICS, ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION, ENERGY POLICY, ENERGY PRICE, ENERGY PRICES, ENERGY PRODUCTION, ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, ENERGY USE, ENTERIC FERMENTATION, ENVIRONMENTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, EQUILIBRIUM, ETHANOL, EXPENDITURES, FEEDSTOCKS, FERTILIZATION, FERTILIZERS, FOOD PRODUCTION, FOREST, FOREST AREA, FOREST AREAS, FOREST CARBON, FOREST CONSERVATION, FOREST CONVERSION, FOREST COVER, FOREST LAND, FOREST LANDS, FOREST MANAGEMENT, FOREST MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, FOREST PRODUCTION, FOREST PRODUCTS, FOREST SINKS, FOREST STRUCTURE, FORESTRY, FORESTRY SECTOR, FORESTS, FOSSIL FUEL, FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS, FOSSIL FUELS, FUEL CONSUMPTION, FUEL PRICES, FUEL SUPPLY, FUELS, GHG, GHGS, GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE, GLOBAL ENERGY USE, GLOBAL GREENHOUSE, GLOBAL GREENHOUSE GAS, GLOBAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, GLOBAL WARMING, GREENHOUSE, GREENHOUSE GAS, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION, GREENHOUSE GASES, IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE, INCOME, INCREASE IN CONSUMPTION, INPUT PRICES, INTERNATIONAL ENERGY OUTLOOK, IPCC, IRREVERSIBILITY, LAND ALLOCATION DECISIONS, LAND MANAGEMENT, LAND RESOURCES, LAND USE, LAND USE CHANGE, LAND USE COMPETITION, LAND USE DECISIONS, LAND-USE CHANGE, LAND-USE EMISSIONS, LIQUID FUELS, LIVESTOCK EMISSIONS, LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS, LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY, MANURE, MARGINAL COST, MARKET FAILURES, MARKET PRICES, NATURAL CAPITAL, NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS, NATURAL FORESTS, NATURAL GAS, NATURAL GAS PRICES, NATURAL RESOURCES, NITROGEN, NITROGEN FERTILIZERS, OIL, OIL EQUIVALENT, OIL PRICE, OIL PRICES, OPTION VALUE, PASTURE LAND, PASTURES, PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION, PER CAPITA INCOMES, PETROLEUM CONSUMPTION, PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, POLICY ANALYSIS, POPULATION GROWTH, POWER GENERATION, PP, PRESENT VALUE, PRODUCTION COSTS, PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS, PRODUCTION PROCESSES, PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, PROPERTY RIGHTS, PUBLIC GOOD, RENEWABLE ENERGY, RESOURCE USE, RISING COST, SCENARIOS, SENSITIVITY ANALYSES, SUBSTITUTION, SUM OF EMISSIONS, TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, TEMPERATURE, TERRESTRIAL CARBON, TIMBER, TOTAL CONSUMPTION, TOTAL DEMAND, UTILITY FUNCTION, WAGES, WELFARE FUNCTION,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/06/19696268/confronting-food-energy-environment-trilemma-global-land-use-long-run
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/18810
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Economic, agronomic, and biophysical drivers affect global land use, so all three influences need to be considered in evaluating economically optimal allocations of the world's land resources. A dynamic, forward-looking optimization framework applied over the course of the coming century shows that although some deforestation is optimal in the near term, in the absence of climate change regulation, the desirability of further deforestation is eliminated by mid-century. Although adverse productivity shocks from climate change have a modest effect on global land use, such shocks combined with rapid growth in energy prices lead to significant deforestation and higher greenhouse gas emissions than in the baseline. Imposition of a global greenhouse gas emissions constraint further heightens the competition for land, as fertilizer use declines and land-based mitigation strategies expand. However, anticipation of the constraint largely dilutes its environmental effectiveness, as deforestation accelerates prior to imposition of the target.