FYR of Macedonia : Public Expenditure and Institutional Review
The review was undertaken, and completed against a background of substantial political economic disruption: the Kosovo crisis of 1999 threatened to undermine the country's accomplishments in building macroeconomic, and fiscal stability; and, the security crisis of 2001, tested once again Macedonia's political, and economic integrity. Both instances were successfully surpassed, showing significant steps towards becoming a market oriented state within the European context, and, in its willingness to accept, and ratify the Peace Agreement of November 2001. But, expenditure pressures rose, leading to additional spending, while revenues declined owing to economic weakness, and decreased tax enforcement; clearly, fiscal stability stands on the balance. Not surprising, the quality of expenditures became an important issue, for although acceptable aggregate targets were being achieved, the budget's economic composition was not suited for promoting economic growth. Institutional aspects show that budget preparation, and processes provide no link between policy commitments, and available resources, aggravated by unfounded credibility on the budget, as an instrument for policy formation. Recommendations call for improved resource allocation within fiscal constraints, i.e., reducing public resources, and, laying the foundation for a budget process legal framework. In addition, reforms should be institutionalized through accountability, and capacity building.
Summary: | The review was undertaken, and completed
against a background of substantial political economic
disruption: the Kosovo crisis of 1999 threatened to
undermine the country's accomplishments in building
macroeconomic, and fiscal stability; and, the security
crisis of 2001, tested once again Macedonia's
political, and economic integrity. Both instances were
successfully surpassed, showing significant steps towards
becoming a market oriented state within the European
context, and, in its willingness to accept, and ratify the
Peace Agreement of November 2001. But, expenditure pressures
rose, leading to additional spending, while revenues
declined owing to economic weakness, and decreased tax
enforcement; clearly, fiscal stability stands on the
balance. Not surprising, the quality of expenditures became
an important issue, for although acceptable aggregate
targets were being achieved, the budget's economic
composition was not suited for promoting economic growth.
Institutional aspects show that budget preparation, and
processes provide no link between policy commitments, and
available resources, aggravated by unfounded credibility on
the budget, as an instrument for policy formation.
Recommendations call for improved resource allocation within
fiscal constraints, i.e., reducing public resources, and,
laying the foundation for a budget process legal framework.
In addition, reforms should be institutionalized through
accountability, and capacity building. |
---|