Toward Country-led Development : A Multi-Partner Evaluation of the Comprehensive Development Framework--Synthesis Report

This evaluation report synthesizes the findings of a multi-partner effort to assess implementation of the Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF). The evaluation's primary objectives are to: Identify the factors that have facilitated implementation of CDF principles, and those that have hindered it. Assess the extent to which CDF implementation has affected intermediate outcomes and, to the extent possible, longer-term development outcomes. In the mid-1990s, the aid community began a candid self-assessment. Disappointing development results-especially in Sub-Saharan Africa-had raised troubling questions: Does the emphasis on structural adjustment ignore the poor? Do the many agencies and international organizations working in developing countries overburden, rather than strengthen, the capacity of recipient governments? Does the poor coordination of donors add to the challenge of making development effective? Increasingly, the painful realization of development agencies, recipient countries, and aid analysts was "yes"-the full potential of international aid to reduce poverty by achieving positive, sustainable development results was not being fulfilled.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC 2003
Subjects:DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLANS, COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK, POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES, DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, COUNTRY PROGRAMS, OWNERSHIP, PARTNERSHIP, BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT, DEVELOPMENT IMPACT, HOLISTIC APPROACH, FINANCIAL SUPPORT, DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES, STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, DONORS, HEAVILY INDEBTED POOR COUNTRIES, INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS, AID COORDINATION AID AGENCIES, AID COORDINATION, AUDITS, BILATERAL AID, BUDGET PROCESS, CAPACITY BUILDING, CAS, CASE STUDIES, CASE STUDY, CG, CIVIL SOCIETY, COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT, COUNTRY CASE STUDY, COUNTRY LEVEL, COUNTRY OWNERSHIP, DEBT, DEBT RELIEF, DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES, DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE, DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, DEVELOPMENT GOALS, DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS, DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES, DIS, DONOR AGENCIES, DONOR COMMUNITY, ECONOMIC COOPERATION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ECONOMICS, ECONOMICS RESEARCH, GDP, GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE, GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, HIPC, INCOME COUNTRIES, INCREASED ACCESS, INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES, INTERNATIONAL AID, INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INTERNATIONAL ­ DEVELOPMENT, LEARNING, LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT, LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES, M&E SYSTEMS, MACROECONOMIC STABILIZATION, NATIONAL INCOME, NGO, PARTICIPATORY POVERTY, PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT, PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS, PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES, PERFORMANCE MONITORING, POLICY DIALOGUE, POLICY DISCUSSIONS, POLITICAL COMMITMENT, POLITICAL PARTIES, POOR COUNTRIES, POVERTY ERADICATION, POVERTY ERADICATION ACTION PLAN, POVERTY REDUCTION, POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY, PPA, PRIMARY EDUCATION, PRIORITIES, PRIVATE SECTOR, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC SECTOR, REDUCING POVERTY, RESOURCE ALLOCATION, SERVICE DELIVERY, SERVICE PROVIDERS, SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, SOCIAL EXPENDITURES, SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, TASK TEAM LEADER, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TECHNICAL SUPPORT,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/01/2673071/toward-country-led-development-multi-partner-evaluation-comprehensive-development-framework-toward-country-led-development-multi-partner-evaluation-comprehensive-development-framework-synthesis-report
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15080
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This evaluation report synthesizes the findings of a multi-partner effort to assess implementation of the Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF). The evaluation's primary objectives are to: Identify the factors that have facilitated implementation of CDF principles, and those that have hindered it. Assess the extent to which CDF implementation has affected intermediate outcomes and, to the extent possible, longer-term development outcomes. In the mid-1990s, the aid community began a candid self-assessment. Disappointing development results-especially in Sub-Saharan Africa-had raised troubling questions: Does the emphasis on structural adjustment ignore the poor? Do the many agencies and international organizations working in developing countries overburden, rather than strengthen, the capacity of recipient governments? Does the poor coordination of donors add to the challenge of making development effective? Increasingly, the painful realization of development agencies, recipient countries, and aid analysts was "yes"-the full potential of international aid to reduce poverty by achieving positive, sustainable development results was not being fulfilled.