Thailand's National Nutritional Program : Lessons in Management and Capacity Development

Thailand's community nutrition program has been the most successful in Asia. This paper looks at what made it work from a management and capacity development point of view. Key lessons are identified in the following areas: Building a strong consensus at national and local levels about the importance of nutrition as an investment in the country's future, rather than as a welfare expenditure; using community volunteers on a huge scale, to cut costs, involve and empower local people, instill self-reliance and communicate effectively with target groups; partially empowering communities by involving them in needs assessment, planning, beneficiary selection and program implementation, but keeping central government control over resource allocation, so as to ensure a coherent national program; Seeking local financial contributions to almost all interventions, so as to cut costs, involve communities, instill self-reliance, and increase the chances of sustainability; Making the most use of limited financial and managerial resources by targeting needy provinces, sub-districts and villages, and high risk population groups; Using national nutrition investment plans, rather than policy statements unlinked to resource commitments, as a way of generating a national vision, giving visibility to nutrition, and giving each implementing agency clear responsibilities; Managing the nutrition sector through a series of committees, rather than by a single agency, which encouraged a wide variety of interest groups to feel that nutrition was their business; Building a strong nutrition technical support organization, which also helped maintain commitment to nutrition; Using small amounts of aid for training and building program support capacity, rather than funding large scale service delivery projects. Also discussed is whether the approaches used in Thailand are replicable in other countries, and what nutrition problems and issues remain to be addressed in Thailand.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heaver, Richard, Kachondam, Yongyout
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2002-01
Subjects:NUTRITION POLICY, ACCESS TO SERVICES, AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AGRICULTURE, APPLIED NUTRITION, BASIC HEALTH, BASIC NEEDS, BASIC SANITATION, CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS, CAPACITY-BUILDING, CARE CENTER WORKERS, CHILD GROWTH, CLEAN DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, COMMUNITY CONTROL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY NUTRITION, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION, CONDENSED MILK, COOKING, DAY CARE, DECENTRALIZATION, DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, DISADVANTAGED GROUPS, DRY SEASON, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, EDUCATION, EMPOWERMENT, EXTENSION AGENTS, FAMILIES, FAMILY PLANNING, FEEDING PROGRAMS, FOOD FORTIFICATION, FOOD INSECURITY, FOOD POLICY, FOOD PRODUCTION, FOOD REQUIREMENTS, FOOD SECURITY, FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION, FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, FOOD SUPPLY, GROWTH MONITORING, GROWTH PROMOTION, HEALTH, HEALTH CARE, HEALTH SERVICES, HOUSEHOLDS, HOUSING, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, HYGIENE, IMMUNIZATION, INCOME GENERATION, INFANT FEEDING, INFANT FEEDING PRACTICES, INFANT FORMULA, INFANTS, INFECTIOUS DISEASES, INJURIES, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY, INTERVENTION, IODINE, IRON, IRON DEFICIENCY, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, MALNOURISHED CHILDREN, MALNUTRITION, MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH, MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CARE, MILK, MODERATE MALNUTRITION, NEEDS ASSESSMENT, NUTRITION, NUTRITION EDUCATION, NUTRITION IMPROVEMENT, NUTRITION INTERVENTIONS, NUTRITION PROBLEMS, NUTRITION PROGRAMS, NUTRITION SECTOR, NUTRITION SERVICES, NUTRITION STATUS, NUTRITIONAL CARE, PARASITES, PEM, POOR FAMILIES, POORER PROVINCES, POSTERS, POVERTY ALLEVIATION, PREGNANT WOMEN, PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, PROTEIN, PUBLIC HEALTH, QUALITY OF LIFE, RICE, RISK GROUPS, ROADS, RURAL AREAS, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, RURAL HEALTH, RURAL HOUSEHOLD, SAFE WATER, SAFE WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION, SEVERE MALNUTRITION, SUPERVISION, SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDING, SUSTAINABILITY, VILLAGE COMMUNITIES, VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, VILLAGE LEVEL, VITAMIN A, VITAMIN A DEFICIENCY, VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTATION, WATER SOURCES, WORKERS NUTRITION POLICY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/01/6710264/thailands-national-nutritional-program-lessons-management-capacity-development
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/13729
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Thailand's community nutrition program has been the most successful in Asia. This paper looks at what made it work from a management and capacity development point of view. Key lessons are identified in the following areas: Building a strong consensus at national and local levels about the importance of nutrition as an investment in the country's future, rather than as a welfare expenditure; using community volunteers on a huge scale, to cut costs, involve and empower local people, instill self-reliance and communicate effectively with target groups; partially empowering communities by involving them in needs assessment, planning, beneficiary selection and program implementation, but keeping central government control over resource allocation, so as to ensure a coherent national program; Seeking local financial contributions to almost all interventions, so as to cut costs, involve communities, instill self-reliance, and increase the chances of sustainability; Making the most use of limited financial and managerial resources by targeting needy provinces, sub-districts and villages, and high risk population groups; Using national nutrition investment plans, rather than policy statements unlinked to resource commitments, as a way of generating a national vision, giving visibility to nutrition, and giving each implementing agency clear responsibilities; Managing the nutrition sector through a series of committees, rather than by a single agency, which encouraged a wide variety of interest groups to feel that nutrition was their business; Building a strong nutrition technical support organization, which also helped maintain commitment to nutrition; Using small amounts of aid for training and building program support capacity, rather than funding large scale service delivery projects. Also discussed is whether the approaches used in Thailand are replicable in other countries, and what nutrition problems and issues remain to be addressed in Thailand.