Infrastructure Concessions : To Auction or Not to Auction?

Should a conceding authority auction off or negotiate a contract for an exclusive private infrastructure deal? Advocates of negotiation often argue that a formal competition may take too much time, that the costs of preparing bids may be excessive, and that innovation may be discouraged. But proponents of competitive bidding argue that there are ways to address theses concerns without sacrificing the bidding process. Moreover, they argue, competition may yield a better deal for the conceding authority and enhance the transparency of the process, making the transaction more politically sustainable. This Note examines the arguments.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Klein, Michael
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 1998-11
Subjects:CONCESSIONS, AUCTIONS, CONTRACT NEGOTIATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, BIDDING, BIDDING PROCESS, ECONOMIC COMPETITION AUCTION, AUTHORITY, BARGAINING POWER, BENCHMARK, BENCHMARK PRICE, BENCHMARKS, BID, BIDDERS, BIDS, BONDS, COMPETITIVE BIDDING, COMPETITIVE TENDER, CONSUMERS, CORRUPTION, DEREGULATION, ECONOMIC RESEARCH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS, FINANCIAL STRENGTH, GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES, INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSIONS, INNOVATIONS, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LEARNING, MONOPOLIES, RISK AVERSION, TENDERING, TOTAL COSTS, TRANSPARENCY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1998/11/441576/infrastructure-concessions-auction-or-not-auction
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11526
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098611526
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986115262024-08-08T18:08:38Z Infrastructure Concessions : To Auction or Not to Auction? Klein, Michael CONCESSIONS AUCTIONS CONTRACT NEGOTIATION INFRASTRUCTURE BIDDING BIDDING PROCESS ECONOMIC COMPETITION AUCTION AUCTIONS AUTHORITY BARGAINING POWER BENCHMARK BENCHMARK PRICE BENCHMARKS BID BIDDERS BIDDING BIDS BONDS COMPETITIVE BIDDING COMPETITIVE TENDER CONSUMERS CORRUPTION DEREGULATION ECONOMIC RESEARCH EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS FINANCIAL STRENGTH GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSIONS INNOVATIONS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LEARNING MONOPOLIES RISK AVERSION TENDERING TOTAL COSTS TRANSPARENCY Should a conceding authority auction off or negotiate a contract for an exclusive private infrastructure deal? Advocates of negotiation often argue that a formal competition may take too much time, that the costs of preparing bids may be excessive, and that innovation may be discouraged. But proponents of competitive bidding argue that there are ways to address theses concerns without sacrificing the bidding process. Moreover, they argue, competition may yield a better deal for the conceding authority and enhance the transparency of the process, making the transaction more politically sustainable. This Note examines the arguments. 2012-08-13T15:18:23Z 2012-08-13T15:18:23Z 1998-11 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1998/11/441576/infrastructure-concessions-auction-or-not-auction Viewpoint. -- Note no. 159 (November 1998) https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11526 English Viewpoint CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic CONCESSIONS
AUCTIONS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
INFRASTRUCTURE
BIDDING
BIDDING PROCESS
ECONOMIC COMPETITION AUCTION
AUCTIONS
AUTHORITY
BARGAINING POWER
BENCHMARK
BENCHMARK PRICE
BENCHMARKS
BID
BIDDERS
BIDDING
BIDS
BONDS
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPETITIVE TENDER
CONSUMERS
CORRUPTION
DEREGULATION
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSIONS
INNOVATIONS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
LEARNING
MONOPOLIES
RISK AVERSION
TENDERING
TOTAL COSTS
TRANSPARENCY
CONCESSIONS
AUCTIONS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
INFRASTRUCTURE
BIDDING
BIDDING PROCESS
ECONOMIC COMPETITION AUCTION
AUCTIONS
AUTHORITY
BARGAINING POWER
BENCHMARK
BENCHMARK PRICE
BENCHMARKS
BID
BIDDERS
BIDDING
BIDS
BONDS
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPETITIVE TENDER
CONSUMERS
CORRUPTION
DEREGULATION
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSIONS
INNOVATIONS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
LEARNING
MONOPOLIES
RISK AVERSION
TENDERING
TOTAL COSTS
TRANSPARENCY
spellingShingle CONCESSIONS
AUCTIONS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
INFRASTRUCTURE
BIDDING
BIDDING PROCESS
ECONOMIC COMPETITION AUCTION
AUCTIONS
AUTHORITY
BARGAINING POWER
BENCHMARK
BENCHMARK PRICE
BENCHMARKS
BID
BIDDERS
BIDDING
BIDS
BONDS
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPETITIVE TENDER
CONSUMERS
CORRUPTION
DEREGULATION
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSIONS
INNOVATIONS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
LEARNING
MONOPOLIES
RISK AVERSION
TENDERING
TOTAL COSTS
TRANSPARENCY
CONCESSIONS
AUCTIONS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
INFRASTRUCTURE
BIDDING
BIDDING PROCESS
ECONOMIC COMPETITION AUCTION
AUCTIONS
AUTHORITY
BARGAINING POWER
BENCHMARK
BENCHMARK PRICE
BENCHMARKS
BID
BIDDERS
BIDDING
BIDS
BONDS
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPETITIVE TENDER
CONSUMERS
CORRUPTION
DEREGULATION
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSIONS
INNOVATIONS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
LEARNING
MONOPOLIES
RISK AVERSION
TENDERING
TOTAL COSTS
TRANSPARENCY
Klein, Michael
Infrastructure Concessions : To Auction or Not to Auction?
description Should a conceding authority auction off or negotiate a contract for an exclusive private infrastructure deal? Advocates of negotiation often argue that a formal competition may take too much time, that the costs of preparing bids may be excessive, and that innovation may be discouraged. But proponents of competitive bidding argue that there are ways to address theses concerns without sacrificing the bidding process. Moreover, they argue, competition may yield a better deal for the conceding authority and enhance the transparency of the process, making the transaction more politically sustainable. This Note examines the arguments.
topic_facet CONCESSIONS
AUCTIONS
CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
INFRASTRUCTURE
BIDDING
BIDDING PROCESS
ECONOMIC COMPETITION AUCTION
AUCTIONS
AUTHORITY
BARGAINING POWER
BENCHMARK
BENCHMARK PRICE
BENCHMARKS
BID
BIDDERS
BIDDING
BIDS
BONDS
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
COMPETITIVE TENDER
CONSUMERS
CORRUPTION
DEREGULATION
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSIONS
INNOVATIONS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
LEARNING
MONOPOLIES
RISK AVERSION
TENDERING
TOTAL COSTS
TRANSPARENCY
author Klein, Michael
author_facet Klein, Michael
author_sort Klein, Michael
title Infrastructure Concessions : To Auction or Not to Auction?
title_short Infrastructure Concessions : To Auction or Not to Auction?
title_full Infrastructure Concessions : To Auction or Not to Auction?
title_fullStr Infrastructure Concessions : To Auction or Not to Auction?
title_full_unstemmed Infrastructure Concessions : To Auction or Not to Auction?
title_sort infrastructure concessions : to auction or not to auction?
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 1998-11
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1998/11/441576/infrastructure-concessions-auction-or-not-auction
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11526
work_keys_str_mv AT kleinmichael infrastructureconcessionstoauctionornottoauction
_version_ 1807158915562995712