Monitoring and Evaluation in Disaster Risk Management

This knowledge note addresses the importance of quality monitoring and evaluation in the disaster context. It provides an overview of how each can be used differently in the ex ante and ex post disaster scenarios. Finally, general guidance is given on how to construct a logical framework for evaluating disaster risk management projects by presenting best practices from three recent projects.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katich, Kristina
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2010-12
Subjects:ACCOUNTABILITY, CAPACITY BUILDING, COUNTERFACTUAL, DISASTER, DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, DISASTER PROGRAMS, DISASTER RECOVERY, DISASTER REDUCTION, DISASTER RISK, DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, DOCUMENTS, EARLY WARNING, EARTHQUAKE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, EMERGENCY RESPONSE, EMERGENCY SHELTER, EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, FLOODS, HOUSING, IMPACT ASSESSMENT, IMPACT EVALUATION, IMPACT MONITORING, INDEPENDENT MONITORING, INFORMATION SYSTEM, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INTERMEDIATE INDICATORS, INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY FOR DISASTER REDUCTION, INTERVENTION, LANDSLIDES, LEARNING, LIVELIHOODS, LIVING STANDARDS, M&AMP, E SYSTEMS, NATURAL DISASTER, NATURAL DISASTER MITIGATION, NATURAL DISASTERS, NATURAL HAZARDS, OUTCOME INDICATORS, OUTPUT INDICATORS, PARTICIPATORY MONITORING, POVERTY REDUCTION, PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS, PROGRAMS, PROJECT BENEFICIARIES, PROJECT MONITORING, RECONSTRUCTION, RISK MANAGEMENT, RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT, RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECTS, TARGETING, TSUNAMI, TSUNAMI RECOVERY, WATER SUPPLY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/12/13317123/monitoring-evaluation-disaster-risk-management
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/10119
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This knowledge note addresses the importance of quality monitoring and evaluation in the disaster context. It provides an overview of how each can be used differently in the ex ante and ex post disaster scenarios. Finally, general guidance is given on how to construct a logical framework for evaluating disaster risk management projects by presenting best practices from three recent projects.