Flooding regime and grassland productivity in the Tana River Delta, in Kenya
The floodplain grasslands of the Tana River Delta, located on the East African coast in Kenya, form part of an intertwined socio-ecological deltaic system of high biodiversity value that delivers numerous goods and services. Dominated by Echinochloa stagnina (Retz) P. Beauv., a highly productive species adapted to seasonal flooding, this ecosystem is the major dry-season grazing grounds of the local pastoralist communities. The construction of hydroelectric infrastructure has led to a modification of the flooding regime. The impacts of the resulting reduction of floods in the deltaic zone on ecosystem properties and services still need to be assessed. In such a perspective, this study characterizes the link between the flooding regime of the Tana River and the growth pattern of its floodplain grassland. Aboveground dry phytomass was sampled for 15 months under a wide variety of naturally flooded and non-flooded conditions, irrigation and cutting frequency treatments. Annual aboveground dry phytomass attained high values between 11 T.ha-1 and 32 T.ha-1 and annual net primary production of the grasslands reached 35 T.ha-1.year-1. Growth rates clearly depended on the flooding regime, management and climate conditions and were on average more than twice as fast during, and 50% faster after the floods, relative to pre-flood conditions. A plant growth model allowed testing the effect of different flooding regimes on plant productivity, highlighting very low productivity in the absence of floods. These results suggest that rangeland and water management for the Tana River deltaic grasslands are tightly linked. The projected construction of another dam could lead to a reduction of flood extent and period, a decrease of grassland productivity and growth duration. Mitigation of this type of negative impacts, which will have direct and adverse consequences for the pastoralist communities as well as on the delivery of other goods and services, needs to be undertaken.
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | conference_item biblioteca |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
IRSTEA
|
| Online Access: | http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587872/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/587872/1/Ecosummit_2016_Ech_stagnina.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The floodplain grasslands of the Tana River Delta, located on the East African coast in Kenya, form part of an intertwined socio-ecological deltaic system of high biodiversity value that delivers numerous goods and services. Dominated by Echinochloa stagnina (Retz) P. Beauv., a highly productive species adapted to seasonal flooding, this ecosystem is the major dry-season grazing grounds of the local pastoralist communities. The construction of hydroelectric infrastructure has led to a modification of the flooding regime. The impacts of the resulting reduction of floods in the deltaic zone on ecosystem properties and services still need to be assessed. In such a perspective, this study characterizes the link between the flooding regime of the Tana River and the growth pattern of its floodplain grassland. Aboveground dry phytomass was sampled for 15 months under a wide variety of naturally flooded and non-flooded conditions, irrigation and cutting frequency treatments. Annual aboveground dry phytomass attained high values between 11 T.ha-1 and 32 T.ha-1 and annual net primary production of the grasslands reached 35 T.ha-1.year-1. Growth rates clearly depended on the flooding regime, management and climate conditions and were on average more than twice as fast during, and 50% faster after the floods, relative to pre-flood conditions. A plant growth model allowed testing the effect of different flooding regimes on plant productivity, highlighting very low productivity in the absence of floods. These results suggest that rangeland and water management for the Tana River deltaic grasslands are tightly linked. The projected construction of another dam could lead to a reduction of flood extent and period, a decrease of grassland productivity and growth duration. Mitigation of this type of negative impacts, which will have direct and adverse consequences for the pastoralist communities as well as on the delivery of other goods and services, needs to be undertaken. |
|---|