The limits and failures of existing forest governance standards in semi arid contexts

Dry forests today are managed following the standards of scientific forestry imported in the tropics in the XIXth century by the colonial empires. The model proved efficient to control deforestation and regulate production but its evolution even after decolonization increased the segmentation between forests and agriculture and the lack of consideration for local knowledge by the forest administration. The process of decentralization of forest management that disseminated in the 1990s aimed at bringing back local communities within the formal management of forests. However the results of this process, often restricted to a simple transfer of tools and techniques, have fallen below expectations. If discourses shifted towards a better recognition of local needs, knowledge and constraints, the day-to-day implementation of participatory forest management in the dry lands remains fraught with administrative inefficiencies and a mistrust of local communities. Sustainable management of dry forests is yet to be invented.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gautier, Denis, Garcia, Claude, Negi, S., Wardell, David Andrew
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: BioOne
Subjects:K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales, E14 - Économie et politique du développement, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, E11 - Économie et politique foncières, forêt tropicale, zone aride, aménagement forestier, gestion des ressources naturelles, gouvernance, communauté rurale, décentralisation, utilisation des terres, politique de développement, réglementation, développement durable, approche participative, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_613, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37882, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6700, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2143, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6493, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35332, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6970, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4510, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3825, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1070,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/578077/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/578077/1/Gautier%20et%20al%202015%20-%20The%20limits%20and%20failures%20of%20existing%20forest%20governance%20standards%20in%20semi%20arid%20contexts.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dry forests today are managed following the standards of scientific forestry imported in the tropics in the XIXth century by the colonial empires. The model proved efficient to control deforestation and regulate production but its evolution even after decolonization increased the segmentation between forests and agriculture and the lack of consideration for local knowledge by the forest administration. The process of decentralization of forest management that disseminated in the 1990s aimed at bringing back local communities within the formal management of forests. However the results of this process, often restricted to a simple transfer of tools and techniques, have fallen below expectations. If discourses shifted towards a better recognition of local needs, knowledge and constraints, the day-to-day implementation of participatory forest management in the dry lands remains fraught with administrative inefficiencies and a mistrust of local communities. Sustainable management of dry forests is yet to be invented.