Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests
The basic principle of PES is to pay individuals or groups to protect or enhance natural resources in exchange for financial or in-kind compensation. One striking feature of the PES concept is the diversity of “PES-like” schemes in the real world, which differ greatly from the theoretical conceptualization of PES. We assume that the wide range of designs and outcomes is due to the use of PES tools in particular environmental, political, and economic contexts. More precisely, existing conservation strategies is a determining factor in shaping the PSE-inspired interventions. Here, we analyze the implementation of an internationally-designed direct payments program in Madagascar. We show that the predominance of a coercive logic in the Malagasy conservation strategy determines the conditions under which the direct payments scheme is implemented. The direct payments scheme is intended to be a complementary device for protected area rather than an instrument for land-use change, thus producing initiatives closer to ICDP than PES. Yet, its potential to supplement the implementation of protected area is currently limited, leading us to discuss the conditions under which this potential could be fulfilled.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-576640 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-5766402024-12-18T20:31:45Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/576640/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/576640/ Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests. Brimont Laura, Karsenty Alain. 2015. Ecosystem Services, 14 : 113-121.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.003 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.003> Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests Brimont, Laura Karsenty, Alain eng 2015 Elsevier Ecosystem Services P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E13 - Investissements, financement et crédit E14 - Économie et politique du développement K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales forêt tropicale protection de la forêt conservation des ressources gestion des ressources naturelles politique de l'environnement incitation montant compensatoire utilisation des terres financement zone protégée http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28654 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_29785 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952 Madagascar http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4510 The basic principle of PES is to pay individuals or groups to protect or enhance natural resources in exchange for financial or in-kind compensation. One striking feature of the PES concept is the diversity of “PES-like” schemes in the real world, which differ greatly from the theoretical conceptualization of PES. We assume that the wide range of designs and outcomes is due to the use of PES tools in particular environmental, political, and economic contexts. More precisely, existing conservation strategies is a determining factor in shaping the PSE-inspired interventions. Here, we analyze the implementation of an internationally-designed direct payments program in Madagascar. We show that the predominance of a coercive logic in the Malagasy conservation strategy determines the conditions under which the direct payments scheme is implemented. The direct payments scheme is intended to be a complementary device for protected area rather than an instrument for land-use change, thus producing initiatives closer to ICDP than PES. Yet, its potential to supplement the implementation of protected area is currently limited, leading us to discuss the conditions under which this potential could be fulfilled. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/576640/1/576640.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.003 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.003 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.003 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.003 |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E13 - Investissements, financement et crédit E14 - Économie et politique du développement K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales forêt tropicale protection de la forêt conservation des ressources gestion des ressources naturelles politique de l'environnement incitation montant compensatoire utilisation des terres financement zone protégée http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28654 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_29785 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4510 P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E13 - Investissements, financement et crédit E14 - Économie et politique du développement K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales forêt tropicale protection de la forêt conservation des ressources gestion des ressources naturelles politique de l'environnement incitation montant compensatoire utilisation des terres financement zone protégée http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28654 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_29785 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4510 |
spellingShingle |
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E13 - Investissements, financement et crédit E14 - Économie et politique du développement K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales forêt tropicale protection de la forêt conservation des ressources gestion des ressources naturelles politique de l'environnement incitation montant compensatoire utilisation des terres financement zone protégée http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28654 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_29785 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4510 P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E13 - Investissements, financement et crédit E14 - Économie et politique du développement K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales forêt tropicale protection de la forêt conservation des ressources gestion des ressources naturelles politique de l'environnement incitation montant compensatoire utilisation des terres financement zone protégée http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28654 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_29785 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4510 Brimont, Laura Karsenty, Alain Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests |
description |
The basic principle of PES is to pay individuals or groups to protect or enhance natural resources in exchange for financial or in-kind compensation. One striking feature of the PES concept is the diversity of “PES-like” schemes in the real world, which differ greatly from the theoretical conceptualization of PES. We assume that the wide range of designs and outcomes is due to the use of PES tools in particular environmental, political, and economic contexts. More precisely, existing conservation strategies is a determining factor in shaping the PSE-inspired interventions. Here, we analyze the implementation of an internationally-designed direct payments program in Madagascar. We show that the predominance of a coercive logic in the Malagasy conservation strategy determines the conditions under which the direct payments scheme is implemented. The direct payments scheme is intended to be a complementary device for protected area rather than an instrument for land-use change, thus producing initiatives closer to ICDP than PES. Yet, its potential to supplement the implementation of protected area is currently limited, leading us to discuss the conditions under which this potential could be fulfilled. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E13 - Investissements, financement et crédit E14 - Économie et politique du développement K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales forêt tropicale protection de la forêt conservation des ressources gestion des ressources naturelles politique de l'environnement incitation montant compensatoire utilisation des terres financement zone protégée http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6523 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3818 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28654 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_29785 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4510 |
author |
Brimont, Laura Karsenty, Alain |
author_facet |
Brimont, Laura Karsenty, Alain |
author_sort |
Brimont, Laura |
title |
Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests |
title_short |
Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests |
title_full |
Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests |
title_fullStr |
Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar's dense forests |
title_sort |
between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of pes schemes in madagascar's dense forests |
publisher |
Elsevier |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/576640/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/576640/1/576640.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brimontlaura betweenincentivesandcoercionthethwartedimplementationofpesschemesinmadagascarsdenseforests AT karsentyalain betweenincentivesandcoercionthethwartedimplementationofpesschemesinmadagascarsdenseforests |
_version_ |
1819043135378948096 |