Safeguards at a glance: Supporting the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in REDD+ and other forest-based initiatives
Pledges for new investment in tropical forests may support sustainable development objectives, but also pose risks to forest-dependent communities. We compared nine criteria to understand differences across standards and guidelines, focusing on their engagement with the rights of the IPLCs that steward the forests where REDD+ is implemented.</li> <li>There is considerable variation in how safeguard standards and guidelines engage with the rights of IPLCs.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brochure biblioteca |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2021-12-30
|
| Subjects: | climate change, indigenous people, community forestry, |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/117665 https://www.cifor.org/library/8404 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Pledges for new investment in tropical forests may support sustainable development objectives, but also pose risks to forest-dependent communities. We compared nine criteria to understand differences across standards and guidelines, focusing on their engagement with the rights of the IPLCs that steward the forests where REDD+ is implemented.</li> <li>There is considerable variation in how safeguard standards and guidelines engage with the rights of IPLCs. |
|---|