The Salween River as a transboundary commons: fragmented collective action, hybrid governance and power
Viewing the Salween River as a transboundary commons, this paper illustrates how diverse state and non-state actors and institutions in hybrid and multi-scaled networks have influenced water governance in general, and large dam decision-making processes in particular. Putting power relations at the centre of this analysis and drawing on the conceptual lenses of hybrid governance and critical institutionalism, we show the complexity of the fragmented processes through which decisions have been arrived at, and their implications. In the context of highly asymmetrical power relations throughout the basin, and the absence of an intergovernmental agreement to date, we argue that hybrid networks of state and non-state actors could be strategically engaged to connect parallel and fragmented decision-making landscapes with a goal of inclusively institutionalising the transboundary commons and maintaining connected local commons throughout the basin, foregrounding a concern for ecological and social justice.
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article biblioteca |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-08
|
| Subjects: | water governance, international waters, collective action, hydropower, dams, river basins, state intervention, institutions, decision making, development projects, international agreements, conflicts, nongovernmental organizations, political aspects, development, |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109022 https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12284 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Viewing the Salween River as a transboundary commons, this paper illustrates how diverse state and non-state actors and institutions in hybrid and multi-scaled networks have influenced water governance in general, and large dam decision-making processes in particular. Putting power relations at the centre of this analysis and drawing on the conceptual lenses of hybrid governance and critical institutionalism, we show the complexity of the fragmented processes through which decisions have been arrived at, and their implications. In the context of highly asymmetrical power relations throughout the basin, and the absence of an intergovernmental agreement to date, we argue that hybrid networks of state and non-state actors could be strategically engaged to connect parallel and fragmented decision-making landscapes with a goal of inclusively institutionalising the transboundary commons and maintaining connected local commons throughout the basin, foregrounding a concern for ecological and social justice. |
|---|