Research Insights: Can Voter Preferences Explain Why Governments Underinvest in Public Goods?

A new survey of 6,040 voting-age individuals conducted in seven Latin American metropolitan areas reveals that political and interpersonal mistrust, risk aversion and time impatience are strong predictors of voter preferences for public spending. Respondents with higher mistrust or impatience are more likely to choose transfers over public goods; more impatient respondents are also more likely to choose current spending over public investment. Randomized experiments providing information about the benefits of public investment have the expected average demand impacts. Respondents with high political mistrust or impatience increase their demand for public investment significantly less than others.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Inter-American Development Bank
Other Authors: Philip Keefer
Language:English
Published: Inter-American Development Bank
Subjects:Trust, Public Expenditure, Investment, Public Employment, Political Trust, Voting Behavior, D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior, H20 - Taxation Subsidies and Revenue: General, H50 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General, O10 - Economic Development: General, risk preferences;time preferences,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004212
https://publications.iadb.org/en/research-insights-can-voter-preferences-explain-why-governments-underinvest-public-goods
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A new survey of 6,040 voting-age individuals conducted in seven Latin American metropolitan areas reveals that political and interpersonal mistrust, risk aversion and time impatience are strong predictors of voter preferences for public spending. Respondents with higher mistrust or impatience are more likely to choose transfers over public goods; more impatient respondents are also more likely to choose current spending over public investment. Randomized experiments providing information about the benefits of public investment have the expected average demand impacts. Respondents with high political mistrust or impatience increase their demand for public investment significantly less than others.