Repeated measurement analyses of forages in cropping systems.

Repeated measurements (RM) are common in forage experiments. The data used in this study were accumulated ammonia losses by volatilization (N)and dry matter production (DM) of cynodon dactylon cv. Coastcross pasture from an experiment in blocs with five levels of urea: 0,25, 50, 100 and 200 kg of N ha , applied in five periods (Cuttings). For N, RM were the averages of cuttings and nine days of observation. The F test for the hypothesis of no affect for period and level x period interaction (DM) and for days interaction was not affected by univariate and multivariate tests. However, greenhouse-geisser epsilon estimate was biased downwards. Polynomial contrast in univariate ANOVA and logistic function agreed explaining acumulated N. For DM, uneaqual population variances on different was rejected and the assumption that pairs of observations on the same subject are equally correladet was rejected.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: FREITAS, A. R. de, PRIMAVESI, O. M. A. S. P. R., CORREA, L. de A., PRIMAVESI, A. C. P. de A., POTT, E. B., MASCIOLI, A. dos S.
Other Authors: ALFREDO RIBEIRO DE FREITAS, CPPSE; ODO MARIA ARTUR S P R PRIMAVESI, CPPSE; LUCIANO DE ALMEIDA CORREA, CPPSE; ANA CANDIDA PACHECO DE A PRIMAVESI, CPPSE; EDISON BENO POTT, CPPSE; A. DOS S. MASCIOLI, UNESP.
Format: Artigo de periódico biblioteca
Language:Ingles
English
Published: 2001-02-19
Subjects:Analise de variancia, GML, MIXED an REG procedures, modelo nao linear, Análise Estatística, analysis of variance, statistical analysis,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/45254
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Repeated measurements (RM) are common in forage experiments. The data used in this study were accumulated ammonia losses by volatilization (N)and dry matter production (DM) of cynodon dactylon cv. Coastcross pasture from an experiment in blocs with five levels of urea: 0,25, 50, 100 and 200 kg of N ha , applied in five periods (Cuttings). For N, RM were the averages of cuttings and nine days of observation. The F test for the hypothesis of no affect for period and level x period interaction (DM) and for days interaction was not affected by univariate and multivariate tests. However, greenhouse-geisser epsilon estimate was biased downwards. Polynomial contrast in univariate ANOVA and logistic function agreed explaining acumulated N. For DM, uneaqual population variances on different was rejected and the assumption that pairs of observations on the same subject are equally correladet was rejected.