Prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: Paper presented at the VI National Veterinary Congress

An important differential between anaplasmosis and babesiosis corresponds to the areas of geographical distribution that, in the case of anaplasmosis in America, exceed that of babesiosis in the north and south. While chemoprophylaxis may present an alternative for special situations, the most rational technique appears to be vaccination of calves that will remain in the risk area, with live immunopathogens.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Guglielmone, A. A.
Format: Digital revista
Language:spa
Published: Sociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del Uruguay (SMVU) 1996
Online Access:https://www.revistasmvu.com.uy/index.php/smvu/article/view/526
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id rev-smvu-uy-article-526
record_format ojs
spelling rev-smvu-uy-article-5262020-08-17T17:33:42Z Prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: Paper presented at the VI National Veterinary Congress La prevención de la babesiosis y la anaplasmosis de los bovinos: Trabajo presentado al VI Congreso Nacional de Veterinaria Guglielmone, A. A. Babesiosis Anaplasmosis Bovinos Prevención Babesiosis Anaplasmosis Bovine Prevention An important differential between anaplasmosis and babesiosis corresponds to the areas of geographical distribution that, in the case of anaplasmosis in America, exceed that of babesiosis in the north and south. While chemoprophylaxis may present an alternative for special situations, the most rational technique appears to be vaccination of calves that will remain in the risk area, with live immunopathogens. Un aspecto diferencial importante entre la anaplasmosis y la babesiosis corresponde a las áreas de distribución geográfica que, para el caso de la anaplasmosis en América, excede al de la babesiosis en el norte y en el sur. Mientras que la quimioprofilaxis puede presentar una alternativa para situaciones especiales, la técnica más racional aparenta ser la vacunación de los terneros que permanecerán en la zona de riesgo, con inmunopatógenos vivos. Sociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del Uruguay (SMVU) 1996-12-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://www.revistasmvu.com.uy/index.php/smvu/article/view/526 Veterinaria (Montevideo); Vol. 32 No. 132 (1996): October - December; 5-6 Veterinaria (Montevideo); Vol. 32 Núm. 132 (1996): Octubre - Diciembre; 5-6 Veterinaria (Montevideo); v. 32 n. 132 (1996): Outubro - Dezembro; 5-6 1688-4809 0376-4362 spa https://www.revistasmvu.com.uy/index.php/smvu/article/view/526/347 Derechos de autor 1996 Sociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del Uruguay
institution UDELAR
collection OJS
country Uruguay
countrycode UY
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-smvu-uy
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca de la Facultad de Veterinaria de la UDELAR de UY
language spa
format Digital
author Guglielmone, A. A.
spellingShingle Guglielmone, A. A.
Prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: Paper presented at the VI National Veterinary Congress
author_facet Guglielmone, A. A.
author_sort Guglielmone, A. A.
title Prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: Paper presented at the VI National Veterinary Congress
title_short Prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: Paper presented at the VI National Veterinary Congress
title_full Prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: Paper presented at the VI National Veterinary Congress
title_fullStr Prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: Paper presented at the VI National Veterinary Congress
title_full_unstemmed Prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: Paper presented at the VI National Veterinary Congress
title_sort prevention of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle: paper presented at the vi national veterinary congress
description An important differential between anaplasmosis and babesiosis corresponds to the areas of geographical distribution that, in the case of anaplasmosis in America, exceed that of babesiosis in the north and south. While chemoprophylaxis may present an alternative for special situations, the most rational technique appears to be vaccination of calves that will remain in the risk area, with live immunopathogens.
publisher Sociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del Uruguay (SMVU)
publishDate 1996
url https://www.revistasmvu.com.uy/index.php/smvu/article/view/526
work_keys_str_mv AT guglielmoneaa preventionofbabesiosisandanaplasmosisincattlepaperpresentedatthevinationalveterinarycongress
AT guglielmoneaa laprevenciondelababesiosisylaanaplasmosisdelosbovinostrabajopresentadoalvicongresonacionaldeveterinaria
_version_ 1781886155639226368