Sources of contention and the emerging reality concerning Qohelet's Carpe Diem advice
Abstract: When Qohelet declares “there is nothing new under the sun,” his own words are no exception. It has been known for a century now that not all of Qohelet’s material is original to his own genius, and the idea that Qohelet is directly dependent on a literary source(s) is standard fare. The hallmark example continues to be Siduri the alewife’s advice to Gilgamesh which displays remarkable correspondence with Ecclesiastes 9: 7-9. However, what may have been construed as an instance of clear literary dependency a century ago cannot be maintained in light of the data that continues to emerge from the ancient Near East. New sources have risen that contend with the Gilgamesh Epic, and there has yet to emerge a definitive victor. This paper calls into question the very idea that Qohelet was directly dependent on a literary precursor and joins with a few select voices both past and present in suggesting an alternate interpretation of the data.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo biblioteca |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Historia. Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente
2010
|
| Subjects: | ECLESIASTES, ORIENTE ANTIGUO, POEMA DE GILGAMESH, LITERATURA ANTIGUA, LITERATURA MESOPOTAMICA, |
| Online Access: | https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/6755 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|