Evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of different devices for canine retraction

OBJECTIVE: To mechanically evaluate different systems used for canine retraction. METHODS: Three different methods for partial canine retraction were evaluated: retraction with elastic chain directly attached to bracket; elastic chain connected to bracket hook and with sliding jig activated with the aid of an elastic chain attached to a mini-implant. For this evaluation, a Typodont was adapted to simulate the desired movements when exposed to a heat source. After obtaining the measurements of the movements, statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mini-implant/sliding jig system (Groups M 0.018-in and M 0.019 x 0.026-in) favored less extrusion and distal inclination of the canines in the retraction stage (p < 0.005). Meanwhile, the retraction system with elastic chain directly attached to the orthodontic brackets (Groups C 0.018-in and 0.019 x 0.026-in) favored greater inclination and extrusion than the others, followed by the system of elastic chain attached to the hook (Groups G 0.018-in and 0.019 x 0.026-in). CONCLUSIONS: Canine retraction with the mini-implant/sliding jig system showed the best mechanical control. The worst results were observed with a 0.018 archwire when the elastic chain was attached to the bracket.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruellas,Antônio Carlos de Oliveira, Pithon,Matheus Melo, Santos,Rogério Lacerda dos
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2012
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000300017
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!