Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques

Abstract Introduction: Controlling the surface smoothness characteristics of the composite resin when performing a direct restorative technique is one of the factors involved in achieving restorative success. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques. Material and method: Fifty test specimens were made with the Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE) and then divided into five study groups according to the smoothing and finishing method applied, as follows: G1 (control), polyester strip; G2, composite spatula; G3, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol and dried; G4, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol, dried and moistened with Single Bond (3M ESPE); and G5, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol, dried and moistened with Natural Glaze surface sealant (DFL). After fabrication, the specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water. The surface roughness of the specimens was measured using a profilometer. Surface roughness means were compared by analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test at a level of significance of 5%. Result: The lowest surface roughness was observed in G1 (control group) and the highest, in G3. G5 had lower surface roughness values compared to the other test groups, and presented values similar to those of the control group. Conclusion: The smoothing and finishing techniques influenced the surface roughness of the composite resin. Application of the surface sealant by the copolymerization technique resulted in lower roughness values. The use of a clean, dry brush promoted roughness values beyond the acceptable limit, and is therefore liable to compromise the performance of composite resin restorations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ANSUJ,Micheli Del Frari, SANTOS,Iuri Silveira dos, MARQUEZAN,Marcela, DURAND,Letícia Brandão, POZZOBON,Roselaine Terezinha
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000200110
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1807-25772016000200110
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1807-257720160002001102016-04-26Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniquesANSUJ,Micheli Del FrariSANTOS,Iuri Silveira dosMARQUEZAN,MarcelaDURAND,Letícia BrandãoPOZZOBON,Roselaine Terezinha Composite resins dental materials surface properties Abstract Introduction: Controlling the surface smoothness characteristics of the composite resin when performing a direct restorative technique is one of the factors involved in achieving restorative success. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques. Material and method: Fifty test specimens were made with the Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE) and then divided into five study groups according to the smoothing and finishing method applied, as follows: G1 (control), polyester strip; G2, composite spatula; G3, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol and dried; G4, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol, dried and moistened with Single Bond (3M ESPE); and G5, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol, dried and moistened with Natural Glaze surface sealant (DFL). After fabrication, the specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water. The surface roughness of the specimens was measured using a profilometer. Surface roughness means were compared by analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test at a level of significance of 5%. Result: The lowest surface roughness was observed in G1 (control group) and the highest, in G3. G5 had lower surface roughness values compared to the other test groups, and presented values similar to those of the control group. Conclusion: The smoothing and finishing techniques influenced the surface roughness of the composite resin. Application of the surface sealant by the copolymerization technique resulted in lower roughness values. The use of a clean, dry brush promoted roughness values beyond the acceptable limit, and is therefore liable to compromise the performance of composite resin restorations.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoRevista de Odontologia da UNESP v.45 n.2 20162016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000200110en10.1590/1807-2577.08715
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author ANSUJ,Micheli Del Frari
SANTOS,Iuri Silveira dos
MARQUEZAN,Marcela
DURAND,Letícia Brandão
POZZOBON,Roselaine Terezinha
spellingShingle ANSUJ,Micheli Del Frari
SANTOS,Iuri Silveira dos
MARQUEZAN,Marcela
DURAND,Letícia Brandão
POZZOBON,Roselaine Terezinha
Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques
author_facet ANSUJ,Micheli Del Frari
SANTOS,Iuri Silveira dos
MARQUEZAN,Marcela
DURAND,Letícia Brandão
POZZOBON,Roselaine Terezinha
author_sort ANSUJ,Micheli Del Frari
title Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques
title_short Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques
title_full Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques
title_fullStr Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques
title_sort evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques
description Abstract Introduction: Controlling the surface smoothness characteristics of the composite resin when performing a direct restorative technique is one of the factors involved in achieving restorative success. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques. Material and method: Fifty test specimens were made with the Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE) and then divided into five study groups according to the smoothing and finishing method applied, as follows: G1 (control), polyester strip; G2, composite spatula; G3, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol and dried; G4, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol, dried and moistened with Single Bond (3M ESPE); and G5, brush cleaned with absolute alcohol, dried and moistened with Natural Glaze surface sealant (DFL). After fabrication, the specimens were stored for 24 h in deionized water. The surface roughness of the specimens was measured using a profilometer. Surface roughness means were compared by analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test at a level of significance of 5%. Result: The lowest surface roughness was observed in G1 (control group) and the highest, in G3. G5 had lower surface roughness values compared to the other test groups, and presented values similar to those of the control group. Conclusion: The smoothing and finishing techniques influenced the surface roughness of the composite resin. Application of the surface sealant by the copolymerization technique resulted in lower roughness values. The use of a clean, dry brush promoted roughness values beyond the acceptable limit, and is therefore liable to compromise the performance of composite resin restorations.
publisher Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000200110
work_keys_str_mv AT ansujmichelidelfrari evaluationofthesurfaceroughnessofananofilledcompositeresinsubmittedtodifferentsmoothingandfinishingtechniques
AT santosiurisilveirados evaluationofthesurfaceroughnessofananofilledcompositeresinsubmittedtodifferentsmoothingandfinishingtechniques
AT marquezanmarcela evaluationofthesurfaceroughnessofananofilledcompositeresinsubmittedtodifferentsmoothingandfinishingtechniques
AT durandleticiabrandao evaluationofthesurfaceroughnessofananofilledcompositeresinsubmittedtodifferentsmoothingandfinishingtechniques
AT pozzobonroselaineterezinha evaluationofthesurfaceroughnessofananofilledcompositeresinsubmittedtodifferentsmoothingandfinishingtechniques
_version_ 1756431848285667328