Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature

A systematic review relevant to the following research questions was conducted (1) the extent to which different theoretical frameworks have been applied to food risk/benefit communication and (2) the impact such food risk/benefit communication interventions have had on related risk/benefit attitudes and behaviors. Fifty four papers were identified. The analysis revealed that (primarily European or US) research interest has been relatively recent. Certain food issues were of greater interest to researchers than others, perhaps reflecting the occurrence of a crisis, or policy concern. Three broad themes relevant to the development of best practice in risk (benefit) communication were identified: the characteristics of the target population; the contents of the information; and the characteristics of the information sources. Within these themes, independent and dependent variables differed considerably. Overall, acute risk (benefit) communication will require advances in communication process whereas chronic communication needs to identify audience requirements. Both citizen's risk/benefit perceptions and (if relevant) related behaviors need to be taken into account, and recommendations for behavioral change need to be concrete and actionable. The application of theoretical frameworks to the study of risk (benefit) communication was infrequent, and developing predictive models of effective risk (benefit) communication may be contingent on improved theoretical perspectives.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frewer, L.J., Fischer, A.R.H., Brennan, M., Bánáti, D., Lion, R., Meertens, R.M., Rowe, G., Siegrist, M., Verbeke, W., Vereijken, C.M.J.L.
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Risk perception, benefit communication, food hazard, food safety, risk communication, trust,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/riskbenefit-communication-about-fooda-systematic-review-of-the-li
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-506002
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5060022024-12-04 Frewer, L.J. Fischer, A.R.H. Brennan, M. Bánáti, D. Lion, R. Meertens, R.M. Rowe, G. Siegrist, M. Verbeke, W. Vereijken, C.M.J.L. Article/Letter to editor Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 56 (2016) 10 ISSN: 1040-8398 Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature 2016 A systematic review relevant to the following research questions was conducted (1) the extent to which different theoretical frameworks have been applied to food risk/benefit communication and (2) the impact such food risk/benefit communication interventions have had on related risk/benefit attitudes and behaviors. Fifty four papers were identified. The analysis revealed that (primarily European or US) research interest has been relatively recent. Certain food issues were of greater interest to researchers than others, perhaps reflecting the occurrence of a crisis, or policy concern. Three broad themes relevant to the development of best practice in risk (benefit) communication were identified: the characteristics of the target population; the contents of the information; and the characteristics of the information sources. Within these themes, independent and dependent variables differed considerably. Overall, acute risk (benefit) communication will require advances in communication process whereas chronic communication needs to identify audience requirements. Both citizen's risk/benefit perceptions and (if relevant) related behaviors need to be taken into account, and recommendations for behavioral change need to be concrete and actionable. The application of theoretical frameworks to the study of risk (benefit) communication was infrequent, and developing predictive models of effective risk (benefit) communication may be contingent on improved theoretical perspectives. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/riskbenefit-communication-about-fooda-systematic-review-of-the-li 10.1080/10408398.2013.801337 https://edepot.wur.nl/386273 Risk perception benefit communication food hazard food safety risk communication trust https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Risk perception
benefit communication
food hazard
food safety
risk communication
trust
Risk perception
benefit communication
food hazard
food safety
risk communication
trust
spellingShingle Risk perception
benefit communication
food hazard
food safety
risk communication
trust
Risk perception
benefit communication
food hazard
food safety
risk communication
trust
Frewer, L.J.
Fischer, A.R.H.
Brennan, M.
Bánáti, D.
Lion, R.
Meertens, R.M.
Rowe, G.
Siegrist, M.
Verbeke, W.
Vereijken, C.M.J.L.
Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature
description A systematic review relevant to the following research questions was conducted (1) the extent to which different theoretical frameworks have been applied to food risk/benefit communication and (2) the impact such food risk/benefit communication interventions have had on related risk/benefit attitudes and behaviors. Fifty four papers were identified. The analysis revealed that (primarily European or US) research interest has been relatively recent. Certain food issues were of greater interest to researchers than others, perhaps reflecting the occurrence of a crisis, or policy concern. Three broad themes relevant to the development of best practice in risk (benefit) communication were identified: the characteristics of the target population; the contents of the information; and the characteristics of the information sources. Within these themes, independent and dependent variables differed considerably. Overall, acute risk (benefit) communication will require advances in communication process whereas chronic communication needs to identify audience requirements. Both citizen's risk/benefit perceptions and (if relevant) related behaviors need to be taken into account, and recommendations for behavioral change need to be concrete and actionable. The application of theoretical frameworks to the study of risk (benefit) communication was infrequent, and developing predictive models of effective risk (benefit) communication may be contingent on improved theoretical perspectives.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Risk perception
benefit communication
food hazard
food safety
risk communication
trust
author Frewer, L.J.
Fischer, A.R.H.
Brennan, M.
Bánáti, D.
Lion, R.
Meertens, R.M.
Rowe, G.
Siegrist, M.
Verbeke, W.
Vereijken, C.M.J.L.
author_facet Frewer, L.J.
Fischer, A.R.H.
Brennan, M.
Bánáti, D.
Lion, R.
Meertens, R.M.
Rowe, G.
Siegrist, M.
Verbeke, W.
Vereijken, C.M.J.L.
author_sort Frewer, L.J.
title Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort risk/benefit communication about food—a systematic review of the literature
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/riskbenefit-communication-about-fooda-systematic-review-of-the-li
work_keys_str_mv AT frewerlj riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT fischerarh riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT brennanm riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT banatid riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT lionr riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT meertensrm riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT roweg riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT siegristm riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT verbekew riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT vereijkencmjl riskbenefitcommunicationaboutfoodasystematicreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1819147626457595904