Examination of the measures necessary to specify what would be the financial obligations of a Member State which withdraws from the Organization in the middle of a two-year budgetary period, including the possibility of a request for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice of The Hague on the interpretation that should be given to the Constitution in this matter; item 7.2 of the agenda (document 24 C/27); 15th report
General Conference paper examining the question of the possibility of a request for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice in connection with the above matter, refers to 23 C/Resolution 0.9, and to 125 EX/Decision 8.2 and relevant discussions thereon, suggests postponing consideration of the proposed amendments to Article II, paragraph 6, and Article IX, paragraph 3, of the Constitution, designed to clarify the financial obligations of a Member State which withdraws and to eliminate any ambiguity of interpretation in this respect, until the twenty-fifth session of the General Conference and that the Executive Board continue to study the possibility of requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice and to report thereon to the twenty-fifth session
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | programme and meeting document biblioteca |
Language: | eng ara chi rus |
Subjects: | Legal procedure, Financing, International cooperation, International law, UNESCO, > Constitution, UNESCO, > Relations with Member States, > Contributions, UNESCO, > Relations with Member States, > Withdrawal, UNESCO, > Relations with non-member States, UNESCO, > Relations with USA, UNESCO, > Finances, 1984-1985, UNESCO, > Finances, 1986-1987, UNESCO, > Programme and budget, 1984-1985, UNESCO, > Organization and methods of work, UNESCO, > Programme and budget, 1986-1987, > Programme concentration, UNESCO. Executive Board, 125th session, 1986, |
Online Access: | https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000076282 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|