Monitoring and Evaluation for Results : Lessons from Uganda

Recent experience with monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in Uganda has shown how M&E can be developed to contribute to national capacity building, rather than become a demanding, but unproductive data collection exercise. Symptoms of M&E overload have been addressed by assigning coordination responsibility to the Office of the Prime Minister. Prospects are now improving for aligning M&E capacity with strengthening cost-effectiveness and achievement of value for money in service delivery.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hauge, Arild O., Mackay, Keith
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2004-09
Subjects:ANNUAL REPORT, ANTICORRUPTION, CAPACITY BUILDING, CIVIL SERVICE, CIVIL SOCIETY, COMMUNITIES, DEBT RELIEF, DECISION MAKING, DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS, EDUCATION, EXPENDITURES, HEALTH, HEALTH SECTOR, HEALTH SURVEYS, HEAVILY INDEBTED POOR COUNTRIES, HIPC, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, IMMUNIZATION, IMMUNIZATION COVERAGE, INCIDENCE OF POVERTY, INFANT MORTALITY, LAND USE, LEARNING, M&E ACTIVITIES, M&E CAPACITY, M&E SYSTEMS, MACROECONOMIC STABILITY, MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, MANAGERS, MORTALITY, NATURAL RESOURCES, POVERTY MONITORING, POVERTY OUTCOMES, POVERTY REDUCTION, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY, PUBLIC SERVICES, RADIO, RESOURCE ALLOCATION, SANITATION, SCHOOLS, SERVICE DELIVERY, TARGETING, TRANSPARENCY, WASTE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/09/5531267/monitoring-evaluation-results-lessons-uganda
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/9683
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!