Horizontal Inequalities, Political Environment, and Civil Conflict : Evidence from 55 Developing Countries, 1986-2003

Several studies of civil war have concluded that economic inequality between individuals does not increase the risk of internal armed conflict. This is perhaps not so surprising. Even though an individual may feel frustrated if he is poor compared with other individuals in society, he will not start a rebellion on his own. Civil wars are organized group conflicts, not a matter of individuals randomly committing violence against each other. Hence, we should not neglect the group aspect of human well-being and conflict. Systematic inequalities that coincide with ethnic, religious, or geographical cleavages in a country are often referred to as horizontal inequalities (or inter-group inequalities). Case studies of particular countries as well as some statistical studies have found that such inequalities between identity groups tend to be associated with a higher risk of internal conflict. But the emergence of violent group mobilization in a country with sharp horizontal inequalities may depend on the characteristics of the political regime. For example, in an autocracy, grievances that stem from group inequalities are likely to be large and frequent, but state repression may prevent them from being openly expressed. This paper investigates the relationship between horizontal inequalities, political environment, and civil war in developing countries. Based on national survey data from 55 countries it calculates welfare inequalities between ethnic, religious, and regional groups for each country using indicators such as household assets and educational levels. All the inequality measures, particularly regional inequality, are positively associated with higher risks of conflict outbreak. And it seems that the conflict potential of regional inequality is stronger for pure democratic and intermediate regimes than for pure autocratic regimes. Institutional arrangements also seem to matter. In fact it seems that the conflict potential of horizontal inequalities increases with more inclusive electoral systems. Finally, the presence of both regional inequalities and political exclusion of minority groups seems to make countries particularly at risk for conflict. The main policy implication of these findings is that the combination of politically and economically inclusive government is required to secure peace in developing countries.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Østby, Gudrun
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2007-04
Subjects:ARMED CONFLICT, ASSET INEQUALITY, AUTHORITY, CENSUSES, CENTRAL AMERICA, CIVIL CONFLICT, CIVIL CONFLICTS, CIVIL PEACE, CIVIL STRIFE, CIVIL WAR, CIVIL WARS, CONFLICT RISK, CONFLICT SOCIETIES, CONFLICTS, CONSTITUENCIES, CONSTITUENTS, CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES, COST OF REBELLION, DEMOCRACIES, DEMOCRACY, DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS, DEMOCRATIC REGIMES, DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, DISADVANTAGED GROUPS, DISCRIMINATION, ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, EFFECTS OF POPULATION, ELECTION, ELECTIONS, ELECTORAL SYSTEM, ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, ETHNIC DIVISIONS, ETHNIC GROUP, ETHNIC GROUPS, ETHNIC MINORITIES, GENOCIDE, GROUP GRIEVANCES, GROUP LEADERS, HOUSEHOLD ASSETS, HUMAN SECURITY, IDEAS, INCOME, INTERNAL CONFLICT, INTERNATIONAL PEACE, LATIN AMERICAN, MEASURE OF INEQUALITY, MINORITY, NATURAL RESOURCES, NUTRITION, OPPORTUNITY COST, PEACE, POLICY RESEARCH, POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER, POLITICAL CHANGE, POLITICAL INSTABILITY, POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, POLITICAL PARTIES, POLITICAL POWER, POLITICAL SYSTEM, POOR, POPULATION SIZE, POST CONFLICT, POST-CONFLICT, PROGRESS, RADIO, REBELLION, REGIONAL DIFFERENCES, REGIONAL INEQUALITIES, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POPULATION, RELIGIOUS GROUPS, RESPECT, RISK OF CONFLICT, RISKS OF CONFLICT, SOCIAL CLASS, SOCIAL WELFARE, SOCIETY, SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES, TELEVISION, VIOLENT CONFLICT, WARS, WELFARE INDICATORS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/04/7523837/horizontal-inequalities-political-environment-civil-conflict-evidence-55-developing-countries-1986-2003
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/6999
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!