Higher Wages, Lower Pay : Public vs. Private Sector Compensation in Peru

Do public sector employees earn less than their counterparts in the private sector? This paper addresses this question in the case of Peru, a country where civil service reform is being debated yet the only available empirical studies on wage differentials date back to the late 1980s. Using data from the 2009 national household survey, the authors perform a multiple step analysis. First, they estimate a single equation with a public sector dummy, which is found to be statistically significant and positive when only monetary wages are taken into account. However, when in-kind payments and bonuses are included to measure compensation, the analysis finds a private sector premium. Second, they estimate for public and formal private employees two distinct wage functions, including the inverse Mills ratio. This takes into account the selection bias resulting from workers self-selecting into the public or private sector. Third, these results are used to decompose wage differentials using the standard Oaxaca-Blinder approach. The results show that the compensation differentials are not significant except for the sub-sample of employees that achieved a postgraduate degree.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coppola, Andrea, Calvo-Gonzalez, Oscar
Language:English
Published: 2011-10-01
Subjects:AVERAGE EDUCATION LEVEL, CITIES, CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION, DATA SET, DEPENDENT VARIABLE, DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS, DRIVERS, EARNING, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS, ECONOMIC POLICY, ECONOMIC REVIEW, EDUCATION LEVELS, EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, EMPIRICAL STUDIES, EMPLOYEE, EMPLOYMENT, EXPLANATORY POWER, EXPLANATORY VARIABLE, EXPLANATORY VARIABLES, FIRING COSTS, HOUSEHOLD DATA, HOUSEHOLD SURVEY, HUMAN CAPITAL, HUMAN RESOURCES, JOB SECURITY, LABOR ECONOMICS, LABOR FORCE, LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION, LABOR MARKET, LABOR MARKET DISCRIMINATION, LABOR MARKETS, LEVEL OF EDUCATION, LEVELS OF EDUCATION, LINEAR REGRESSION, NO-SHIRKING CONSTRAINT, POLICY DISCUSSIONS, POLICY RESEARCH, POLITICAL ECONOMY, POSITIVE EFFECT, POSITIVE IMPACT, POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION, PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS, PREVIOUS SECTION, PRIMARY EDUCATION, PRIVATE SECTOR, PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYEE, PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYEES, PRIVATE SECTOR JOB, PRIVATE SECTOR PUBLIC, PRIVATE SECTOR WAGE, PRIVATE SECTOR WAGES, PRIVATE SECTOR WORKERS, PRIVATE SECTORS, PROBIT EQUATION, PROBIT EQUATIONS, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC EXPENDITURES, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SECTOR COMPENSATION, PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEE, PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES, PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT, PUBLIC SECTOR JOB, PUBLIC SECTOR PAY, PUBLIC SECTOR WAGE, PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES, PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS, PUBLIC SECTORS, REGRESSION ANALYSIS, RETIREMENT, SERVANTS, SKILLED WORKERS, URBAN AREAS, URBAN WORKERS, WAGE BILL, WAGE COMPRESSION, WAGE DATA, WAGE DIFFERENTIAL, WAGE DIFFERENTIALS, WAGE DISTRIBUTION, WAGE LEVELS, WAGE PREMIUM, WAGE RATES, WORKER, WORKERS, WORKING EXPERIENCE,
Online Access:http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20111026082814
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/3624
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!