Exploring the Deployment, Perceived Effectiveness, and Monitoring of Remote and Remedial Learning

This study includes three main sections that have been organized in a chronological order within this report: the first one, “What can we learn from education emergency responses in low- and middle-income countries?” analyzes the emergency education responses to the COVID-19 pandemic of over 120 governments from April until May, 2020. The second section, “Is remote learning perceived as effective? An in-depth analysis across five countries” discusses the main national education responses deployed by Brazil, Kenya, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and Peru, as well as the perceived effectiveness of these strategies conducted from May until August, 2020. The third section, “What works with remote and remedial strategies? an analysis across 13 countries” builds on key lessons learned during the analysis of the five multi-country experiences and presents global trends of remote learning implemented during school closures and the actions governments adopted to get ready for remedial learning, conducted from August until December 2020. The countries prioritized for the third section are IDA borrowing countries of which six are low-income countries.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Report biblioteca
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2021-08-03
Subjects:INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, SERVICE DELIVERY, TEACHER TRAINING, MONITORING AND EVALUATION, LEARNING LOSS, COPING POLICIES, LEARNING RECOVERY, PANDEMIC IMPACT, PANDEMIC RESPONSE, CORONAVIRUS, COVID-19, REMOTE LEARNING, TEACHER SUPPORT, EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/668741627975171644/Exploring-the-Deployment-Perceived-Effectiveness-and-Monitoring-of-Remote-and-Remedial-Learning
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36061
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!