Subjective Perceptions of the Impact of the Global Economic Crisis in Europe and Central Asia : The Household Perspective

This paper analyzes the subjective impact of the global economic crisis on households in Europe and Central Asia and relates subjective impacts to consumption, actual shocks, and coping strategies, using the 2010 Life in Transition Survey. Two-thirds of respondents in Europe and Central Asia report their household was subjectively affected, primarily through the labor market. The findings underscore the limitations of cross-country comparisons of subjective perceptions, due to reporting biases. Within countries, richer households felt a decline in their relative income position, consistent with evidence from household budget surveys that the crisis reduced the consumption of the middle and upper classes. But the analysis also finds that poorer households report being (subjectively) affected by the crisis more. Differences in the feasibility of coping strategies may help explain variations in subjective perceptions: the poorest were forced to reduce their staple food consumption and health spending, and tended to depend on public safety nets. Richer households had more options to cope, pursuing so-called "active strategies" (such as increasing their labor supply), borrowing, and cutting spending on non-essentials. Transition countries differed significantly from western European comparator countries in that public safety nets had lower coverage, private safety nets and informal insurance mechanisms could not meet the shortfall in income, and a large proportion of their populations reduced the consumption of basic necessities. The paper finds subjective perceptions of the impact of the crisis to be relevant to socio-political outcomes: the harder the impact, the lower the life satisfaction level and the more negative the assessment of government performance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bidani, Benu, Diagne, Mame Fatou, Zaidi, Salman
Format: Policy Research Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2012-03-01
Subjects:AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION, ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS, BORROWING, CHILD SUPPORT, COPING STRATEGIES, CURRENT CONSUMPTION, DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, ECONOMIC CRISIS, ECONOMIC GROWTH, ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, ECONOMICS, EMPLOYMENT STATUS, FARM PRODUCTS, FEMALE, FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS, FINANCIAL CRISIS, FOOD CONSUMPTION, FOOD PRICE, GOVERNMENT BENEFITS, HEALTH EXPENDITURE, HEALTH EXPENDITURES, HEALTH INSURANCE, HEALTH SPENDING, HOUSEHOLD BUDGET, HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS, HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS, HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, HOUSEHOLD DATA, HOUSEHOLD HEAD, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, HOUSEHOLD LEVEL, HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS, HOUSEHOLD SIZE, HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS, HOUSEHOLD WELFARE, HOUSING, IMPACT ON POVERTY, INCOME, INCOME CHANGES, INCOME LOSS, INCOME SUPPORT, INEQUALITY, INFORMAL INSURANCE, INFORMAL INSURANCE MECHANISMS, INFORMAL TRANSFERS, JOB LOSS, JOB-LOSS, LABOR FORCE, LABOR MARKET, LABOR SUPPLY, LABOUR, MEASURED CONSUMPTION, MINIMUM INCOME, MOBILITY, PENSIONS, PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION, POOR, POOR HOUSEHOLDS, POVERTY INCIDENCE, POVERTY REDUCTION, PRIVATE SAFETY NETS, PUBLIC SAFETY, PUBLIC SAFETY NETS, RECESSIONS, RENTS, RURAL, RURAL ASSETS, SAFETY NET, SAVINGS, SHOCK, SOCIAL ASSISTANCE, SOCIAL EXCLUSION, SOCIAL INSURANCE, SOCIAL SAFETY NETS, TARGETING, TRANSITION COUNTRIES, UNEMPLOYED, UNEMPLOYMENT, UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE, UNIVERSAL BENEFITS, VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS, WAGES, WORKING HOURS,
Online Access:http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20120312135856
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3283
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!