Savings Defaults and Payment Delays for Cash Transfers
Financial products and transfer schemes are typically designed to improve welfare by helping individuals follow through on their intertemporal plans. We implement an artefactual field experiment in Malawi to test the ability of households to manage a cash windfall by varying whether 474 households receive a payment in cash or through direct deposit into pre-established accounts at a local bank. Payments are made immediately, with one day delay, or with eight days delay. Defaulting the payments into savings accounts leads to higher net deposits into bank accounts, an effect that persists for a number of weeks afterwards. However, neither savings defaults nor payment delays affect the amount or composition of spending, suggesting that households manage cash effectively without the use of formal financial products.
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article biblioteca |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2017-11
|
| Subjects: | SAVINGS DEFAULTS, MENTAL ACCOUNTING, TIME INCONSISTENCY, NUDGES, DIRECT DEPOSIT, TRANSFER SCHEMES, WELFARE IMPACT, CASH TRANSFERS, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, HOUSEHOLD SPENDING, |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29256 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|