Integrating Social Accountability Approaches into Extractive Industries Projects

This note provides guidance on how to use social accountability (SA) approaches in oil, gas, and mining projects, with particular emphasis on World Bank projects in the extractive industry (EI) sectors. It highlights some consequences of poor transparency and accountability in EI sectors and identifies opportunities for addressing these issues. It demonstrates how the use of SA approaches and tools can improve the implementation and outcomes of EI projects. Although the note is written primarily for a World Bank/International Finance Corporation (IFC) audience and project cycle, it is hoped that it will be a resource for government, industry, and civil society partners as well.

Bibliographic Details

Main Authors:	Heller, Katherine, van Wicklin III, Warren, Kumagai, Saki
Format:	Working Paper biblioteca
Language:	English en_US
Published:	World Bank, Washington, DC 2016-05
Subjects:	FOCUS GROUPS, DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES, EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES, ADVOCACY, LOCAL AUTHORITIES, LOCAL CAPACITY, PARTICIPANTS, CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES, CIVIL SOCIETY INVOLVEMENT, CIVIL SOCIETIES, CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT, MERCURY, TARGET GROUPS, GOOD GOVERNANCE, COMMUNITY SCORECARDS, PREPARATION, COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS, BUDGET LITERACY, INCENTIVES, CAPACITY BUILDING, BORROWERS, SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVES, INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES, CORRUPTION, AWARENESS RAISING, BENEFICIARIES, OVERSIGHT, MOBILIZATION, CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION, CITIZEN MONITORING, CREDIBILITY, ENABLING ENVIRONMENT, POVERTY REDUCTION, COLLABORATION, AFFECTED PARTIES, RIGHT TO INFORMATION, FISCAL POLICIES, WORKPLACE, PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT, PARTICIPATORY BUDGET, RELEVANCE, CIVIL SOCIETY CAPACITY, BUDGET ALLOCATION, CITIZEN PARTICIPATION, CIVIL SOCIETY, POWER-HOLDERS, DEMOCRACY, PARTICIPATORY PLANNING, COMMUNITY LEADERS, BUDGET ANALYSIS, CIVIL SOCIETY GROUP, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION, ACCESS, CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS, NEGOTIATIONS, JOURNALISTS, DATA ANALYSIS, SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, PROBLEM SOLVING, MARGINALIZED GROUPS, GRANTS, PROJECT DESIGN, ACCESS TO INFORMATION, GOVERNMENT SERVICES, CONSENSUS APPROACH, GRANT, COMMUNITY SCORECARD, INTERVIEWS, ACCOUNTABILITY, DEMANDS FOR TRANSPARENCY, TRANSPARENCY, INDEPENDENT AUDITOR, BEST PRACTICES, BUDGET PROCESS, PARTICIPATION, CITIZENS’ JURIES, SURVEY, CODES OF CONDUCT, STAKEHOLDERS, CONSULTATIONS, SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY, PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING, WORKSHOP, CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION, ANTI-CORRUPTION, PUBLIC AWARENESS, SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS, PARTICIPATORY PROCESS, CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY, OPENNESS, WORKSHOPS, CIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGEMENT, CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT, SOCIAL POLICIES, HUMAN RIGHTS, PARTICIPATORY POLICY, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, CONSENSUS, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, PARTICIPATORY MONITORING, SOCIAL AUDIT, WORKING CONDITIONS, SOCIAL AUDITS, PARTNERS, FACILITATORS, PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT, STAKEHOLDER, BUDGET MONITORING, BOOT, CBO, PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY, COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT, OUTREACH, STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, PUBLIC MEETINGS, COMMUNITY RADIO, AUDITING, SOCIAL INVESTMENT, SERVICE PROVIDERS,
Online Access:	http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/06/26507294/integrating-social-accountability-approaches-extractive-industries-projects-guidance-note https://hdl.handle.net/10986/24771
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!