Unconditional Cash Transfers in China

This paper examines China’s rural minimum living standard guarantee (dibao) program, one of the largest minimum income cash transfer schemes in the world. Using household survey data matched with published administrative data, the paper describes the dibao program, estimates the program’s impact on poverty, and carries out targeting analysis. The analysis finds that the program provides sufficient income to poor beneficiaries but does not substantially reduce the overall level of poverty, in part because the number of beneficiaries is small relative to the number of poor. Conventional targeting analysis reveals rather large inclusionary and exclusionary targeting errors; propensity score targeting analysis yields smaller but still large targeting errors. Simulations of possible reforms to the dibao program indicate that expanding coverage can potentially yield greater poverty reduction than increasing transfer amounts. In addition, replacing locally diverse dibao lines with a nationally uniform dibao threshold could in theory reduce poverty. The potential gains in poverty reduction, however, depend on the effectiveness of targeting.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Golan, Jennifer, Sicular, Terry, Umapathi, Nithin
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2015-07
Subjects:POVERTY THRESHOLD, HOUSEHOLD INCOMES, TRANSFER AMOUNTS, POOR‐ PEOPLE, HOUSEHOLD SURVEY, HOUSEHOLD SIZE, CASH TRANSFER PROGRAM, POVERTY REDUCTION, VILLAGE LEADERS, POVERTY LINE, IMPACT ON POVERTY, PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION, FEEDBACK, POVERTY LEVELS, NET INCOME, INCOME, SCHOOLING, POVERTY RATES, HOUSEHOLD PARTICIPATION, RURAL POOR, HOUSEHOLD‐SIZE, COUNTERFACTUAL, PROGRAMS, HOUSING, DEATH, RURAL INCOMES, FAMILY MEMBERS, IMPACTS, EGALITARIAN DISTRIBUTION, POOR PEOPLE, POVERTY GAP INDEX, POORER GROUPS, POORER HOUSEHOLDS, POVERTY‐REDUCING, INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINES, POOR AREA, CORRUPTION, SOCIAL PROGRAMS, REGIONAL POPULATIONS, SOCIAL ASSISTANCE, RURAL POPULATION, BENEFICIARIES, MEASURES, POVERTY MEASURES, INSTRUMENTS, RURAL CONSUMER, REGION, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, POORER AREAS, POVERTY OUTCOMES, SAVINGS, DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS, RURAL HOUSEHOLD, PER CAPITA INCOME, RURAL HOUSEHOLDS, NATURAL DISASTER, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, HOUSEHOLD HEAD, POVERTY GAP, VILLAGE CHARACTERISTICS, SOCIAL PROTECTION, PARTICIPATION RATES, POVERTY INCIDENCE, TRANSFERS, POOR AREAS, DESTITUTE HOUSEHOLDS, ESTIMATES OF POVERTY, LEARNING, INDICATORS, SOCIAL SECURITY, RESEARCH, CASH TRANSFERS, POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS, POVERTY LINES, CONSUMPTION, RURAL POVERTY, POLICY CHANGES, POVERTY IMPACTS, ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAM, PARTICIPATION, VILLAGE‐LEVEL, POVERTY‐REDUCTION, POOR‐AREAS, HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME, POVERTY IMPACT, FLEXIBILITY, RURAL POVERTY ALLEVIATION, ABSOLUTE POVERTY, RURAL ECONOMY, RURAL, MEANS TESTING, SAMPLE SIZE, RURAL EMPLOYMENT, POOR BENEFICIARIES, TRANSFER PROGRAMS, SURVEYS, POOR COUNTIES, CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS, TARGETING, RURAL AREAS, REGIONS, VILLAGE LEVEL, STATISTICS, EVALUATION, POOR HOUSEHOLDS, SAMPLING, POVERTY, POVERTY ALLEVIATION, BENEFICIARY HOUSEHOLDS, CONSUMER PRICE INDEX, POVERTY RATE, POOR, AUTONOMOUS REGIONS, OUTCOMES, WAGE EMPLOYMENT, AUDITING, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INEQUALITY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/07/24808135/unconditional-cash-transfers-china-analysis-rural-minimum-living-standard-guarantee-program
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/22458
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!