Sri Lanka : Country Financial Accountability Assessment

The framework for public financial accountability in Sri Lanka is founded in the principles of governance associated with the model inherited from the British, widely accepted as appropriate for the country. The primary accountability institutions, and organizations for financial management, control, audit and legislative scrutiny have, however, not evolved in line with the changes in the more advanced democracies of a similar background. This lapse has reduced the effectiveness of the system of public financial accountability in Sri Lanka, resulting in less than adequate assurance, that public funds are used for the purposes intended with due consideration to economy and efficiency. Financial accountability at the sub-national level is less well developed than at the center. The reasons for this are similar to those concerning the central Government, but more acute and pronounced. Public enterprises are characterized by excessive staff; weak management; inefficiencies; heavy losses; dependency on budget transfers; and delayed publication of audited accounts, thus, further eroding public financial accountability. Discussions with stakeholders on reforms, centered around the urgent need to improve public financial accountability, showing five priority areas of concern: 1) Parliamentary control of the public purse has become ineffective, which can be restored by strengthening the oversight function provided by the public accounts and public enterprises committees; 2) the accountability of the executive is too focused on 'spending to budget', rather than on 'managing for results', therefore, introducing, on a progressive basis, a performance based culture with incentives focused on achievement of outputs and outcomes, and, holding government officials accountable for meeting objectives and performance standards should be considered; 3) need for strengthening the public audit function; 4) removing obstacles, and re-visiting the Establishment Code could prod good governance practices; and, 5) addressing greater specificity on financial accounting, reporting, auditing, and capacity building at sub-national levels.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC 2003-06-30
Subjects:FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC FINANCE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION, ACCOUNTING & REPORTING, PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, GOVERNANCE APPROACH, CAPACITY BUILDING, INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, PUBLIC ENTERPRISES, BUDGET CONTROL, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES, LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, INFORMATION CONTENT, ACCOUNTABILITY, ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORK, ACCOUNTING POLICIES, ACCOUNTING PRACTICES, ACCOUNTING STANDARDS, ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING, ADB, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES, ASSET MANAGEMENT, AUDITING, AUTHORITY, BLOCK GRANTS, BUDGET DEFICIT, BUREAUCRACY, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, CONSTITUTION, COUNCILS, DEBT, DEBT MANAGEMENT, DECISION MAKING, DEVOLUTION, DISCLOSURE, ECONOMIC GROWTH, ECONOMIC POLICIES, ELECTRICITY, EXPENDITURE, FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY, FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING, FINANCIAL CONTROL, FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE, FINANCIAL INFORMATION, FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, FINANCIAL REGULATIONS, FINANCIAL REPORTING, FISCAL, FISCAL DISCIPLINE, FISCAL MANAGEMENT, FIXED ASSET, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, GOVERNMENT FINANCE, GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES, GOVERNMENT LEVEL, GOVERNMENT OWNED COMPANIES, GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY, GOVERNMENT REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SERVICES, GOVERNMENT SPENDING, HUMAN RESOURCES, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY, INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS, INTERNAL CONTROLS, LACK OF CLARITY, LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, LAWS, LEGAL PROTECTION, LEGAL PROVISIONS, LEGISLATION, LEGISLATORS, LEGISLATURE, LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT, LOCAL AUTHORITIES, LOCAL AUTHORITY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, MIGRATION, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, NATIONAL LEVEL, POLITICAL INTERFERENCE, PRIVATE SECTOR, PRIVATIZATION, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC FUNDS, PUBLIC RESOURCES, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING, PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM, REVENUE COLLECTION, REVENUE MANAGEMENT, RIGHT OF APPEAL, STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES, SUBSIDIARY, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TRANSPARENCY, TREASURY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/06/3100541/sri-lanka-country-financial-accountability-assessment
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/14597
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!