India, Uttar Pradesh : State Financial Accountability Assessment

Uttar Pradesh (UP) is India's most populous State, and one of the poorest. Serious fiscal problems have emerged since the 1990s: the revenue deficit has increased significantly over the years, as well as the fiscal deficit, and, arrangements for accountability in the public sector have been undermined. Procedures exist for budgeting and monitoring the use of public resources, but there is little incentive to follow them. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India questions numerous departmental actions each year, but there is no compulsion on the executive branch to provide prompt answers, and to make necessary changes. Some useful progress has been made in implementing the financial management reform program over the last three years, as follows: 1) Computerization of the Treasuries in a network system has been completed at state government level, enabling the Government to monitor cash flows and prevent excess expenditures; 2) a Directorate of Internal Audit has been established in the Department of Finance to provide central leadership, and guidance in the development of departmental audit; and, 3) measures are being taken to establish better control over payrolls. The report reviews the strengths and weaknesses in financial management and accountability, to present a risk analysis that highlights widespread irregularities, and lack of prompt and predictable corrective action, meaning that the overall level of fiduciary risk remains high. It suggests there is significant scope for the Government of UP to improve the efficiency, and effectiveness of public spending through further consolidation of the budget, better matching of accountability with responsibility, routine enforcement of accountability, and greater transparency. This would be fully consistent with the fiscal reform program, and would have a direct impact on the GoUP's ability to provide more, and better quality public services to the poor. Recommendations suggest to a) depute one or more senior officials in the Finance Department to oversee public financial accountability reforms; b) review and update Financial Handbooks, Treasury Rules and Budget Manuals; c) develop and implement a Medium Term Expenditure framework in major spending departments of GoUP; and, d) strengthen accountability in Rural Local Bodies, in internal controls in Development Authorities, in internal audit within GoUP, in state government training institutions, and, build capacities within the Finance Department.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Country Financial Accountability Assessment biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC 2004-08-31
Subjects:STATE FINANCE, PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, BUDGET EXECUTION, EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS, RESOURCE ALLOCATION PROCESSES, LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, LEGISLATIVE REFORM, LAW ENFORCEMENT, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INTERNAL AUDIT, STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES, EXTERNAL AUDITORS, STRATEGIC COORDINATION MECHANISMS, BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION, FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS, FISCAL TRANSPARENCY, GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING, AUDITING, INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, RISK ASSESSMENT, RISK MANAGEMENT, CAPACITY BUILDING, ACCOUNT, ACCOUNTANTS, ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING, ADJUSTMENT LENDING, ASSET MANAGEMENT, AUDIT COMMITTEES, AUDIT REPORTS, AUDITED ACCOUNTS, AUDITORS, AUDITS, BANK ACCOUNTS, BANK CREDIT, BANK REPORTS, BUDGET ESTIMATES, BUDGET MANAGEMENT, BUDGET MONITORING, BUDGET PROCESS, BUDGETING, CASH FLOWS, CASH MANAGEMENT, CIVIL SERVICE, CONSOLIDATION, DEBT, DEBT MANAGEMENT, DEFICITS, DEPOSITS, DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES, DEVOLUTION, DISBURSEMENTS, ELECTRICITY, ENTERPRISE REFORM, ESCROW ACCOUNTS, EXTRA BUDGETARY FUNDS, FINANCE STATISTICS, FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY, FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL REPORTING, FINANCIAL SUPPORT, FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS, FISCAL DEFICITS, FISCAL DISCIPLINE, FISCAL REFORM, FIXED ASSET, GOVERNMENT FINANCE, HOUSING, INCOME, INTERNAL AUDITORS, INTERNAL CONTROLS, INVENTORY, INVESTMENT PROJECTS, LEADERSHIP, LEGAL FRAMEWORK, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, MANAGEMENT INFORMATION, MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, MANAGEMENT TRAINING, MATCHING, MISMANAGEMENT, OPERATING EXPENSES, PEER REVIEW, PENALTIES, PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR, PROCUREMENT, PUBLIC ENTERPRISES, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW, PUBLIC EXPENDITURES, PUBLIC FUNDS, PUBLIC RELATIONS, PUBLIC RESOURCES, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SERVANTS, PUBLIC SERVICES, PUBLIC SPENDING, PUBLIC WORKS, RECURRENT COST, REFORM POLICY, REFORMS, REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, REVENUE COLLECTION, ROADS, SECRETS, SINKING FUNDS, SUBSIDIARIES, TAX, TAX REVENUE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TRANSPARENCY, TRANSPORT, TREASURY, TREASURY OPERATIONS STATE FINANCE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/08/5153288/india-uttar-pradesh-state-financial-accountability-assessment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14570
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!