Uzbekistan : Country Procurement Assessment Report
Uzbekistan inherited the Soviet system
for the procurement of goods, works and services for State
needs. This system was suitable for a command economy but
lacks the essential elements of competitiveness,
transparency and accountability, which are the hallmarks of
a market-based approach to government contracting. This
Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR) comes at a time
when a number of factors are creating an increased need for
public procurement reform. Primary among these is that
Uzbekistan has concluded a Partnership and Cooperation
Agreement (PCA) with the European Union which commits the
Government to develop conditions for open and competitive
award of procurement contracts. Also, the country's
application for membership to the World Trade Organization
(WTO) may lead to accession to the WTO Agreement on
Government Procurement (GPA), thereby creating an obligation
on Uzbekistan to align its procurement legislation with the
GPA. The report, examines all areas of public procurement
operations, including, legislative framework, performance of
regulatory functions, capacity of public sector institutions
and the effects of corruption on procurement. It also
recommends the Government to prepare a new draft Law on
Public Procurement based on the January 2000 draft Law on
Government Procurement.
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: |
World Bank |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2003-02
|
Subjects: | PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES,
CAPACITY BUILDING,
LEGAL FRAMEWORK,
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION,
CORRUPTION,
PARTNERSHIPS,
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS,
COMPETITIVENESS,
PROCUREMENT,
BID FORMS,
BIDDING DOCUMENTS,
LEGISLATION ABUSES,
ACCOUNTABILITY,
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES,
ANTI- CORRUPTION,
ANTI- CORRUPTION STRATEGY,
ANTI-CORRUPTION,
AUDITS,
BUDGET DEFICIT,
BUREAUCRATIC DISCRETION,
CERTIFICATION,
COMMODITIES,
COMPETITIVE BIDDING,
COMPLAINTS,
CONSTITUTION,
DISCRETION,
ENACTMENT,
EXECUTION,
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS,
FISCAL,
FOREIGN BORROWING,
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT,
FOREIGN EXCHANGE,
FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGIME,
FOREIGN INVESTMENT,
FOREIGN TRADE,
GOVERNMENT CONTROLS,
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES,
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS,
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION,
INSTITUTION BUILDING,
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS,
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK,
INTERNAL AUDIT,
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW,
LAWS,
LEGALITY,
LEGISLATION,
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK,
LEGISLATIVE REFORM,
LOCAL AUTHORITIES,
LOCAL GOVERNMENT,
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS,
MINISTERS,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
NATIONS,
ORGANIZATIONAL REFORM,
PREFERENTIAL,
PRIVATIZATION,
PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS,
PUBLIC,
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE,
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES,
PUBLIC FINANCE,
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS,
PUBLIC OFFICIALS,
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT,
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM,
PUBLIC SECTOR,
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT,
RAILWAYS,
REGULATORY AGENCY,
REGULATORY AUTHORITY,
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK,
REHABILITATION,
REPRESENTATIVES,
REPUBLICS,
SENIOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS,
SOCIAL SECURITY,
SOLICITATION,
STATE ENTERPRISES,
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT,
TAXATION,
TENDERING,
TRANSPARENCY, |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/02/2355387/uzbekistan-country-procurement-assessment-report
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/14346
|
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|