Romania - Functional Review : Center of government

The medium-term objective of this review of the Center of Government (CoG) is to improve the Government's policy performance by strengthening Romania's policy process and policy institutions. The objective of the review will be accomplished by identifying short- and medium-term measures to strengthen central capacity to deliver high quality policy management to the Prime Minister and government and effectively coordinate policy with other central institutions and line ministries. Four critical success factors will signal effective implementation: 1. Decision makers will focus increasingly on strategic rather than legal or administrative issues; 2. Sound policy formulation will precede and guide legal drafting; 3. GSG will be empowered by the Prime Minister to enforce the rules and assure the quality of ministry proposals; and 4. The central institutions responsible for public policy and public finance management will work collaboratively to provide coherent, high quality support to the GoR. 2. The CoG review seeks to engage Romania's decision makers in these deliberations and, ultimately, in a concerted effort to improve Romania's policy performance.

Bibliographic Details

Main Authors:	Evans, Gord, Evans, Anne, Giosan, Victor, Myers, Bernard, Dinu, Dragos
Language:	English en_US
Published:	Washington, DC 2010-10
Subjects:	ACCOUNTABILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY FOR RESULTS, ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORK, ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES, ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY, ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES, AMENDMENT, ANNUAL BUDGET, ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS, ANNUAL REPORT, ANNUAL REPORTS, ASSETS, BEST PRACTICE, BEST PRACTICES, BUDGET ADMINISTRATION, BUDGET FORMULATION, BUDGET PLANNING, BUDGET PROCESS, BUDGET REQUESTS, BUSINESS REGULATION, CABINET, CABINET OFFICE, CANDIDATES, CAPACITY BUILDING, CIVIL SERVANT, CIVIL SERVICE, CIVIL SOCIETY, CLIMATE, CONSENSUS BUILDING, CONSULTATION, CRIMES, DATA COLLECTION, DECISION MAKERS, DECISION MAKING, DECISION-MAKING, DISCRETION, EARLY WARNING SYSTEM, ECONOMIC GROWTH, ECONOMIC POLICY, EXPENDITURE DEMANDS, EXPENDITURES, EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE, FINAL REPORT, FINANCE MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL COSTS, FINANCIAL CRISIS, FINANCIAL DECISIONS, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, FINANCIAL PRIORITIES, FINANCIAL PROPOSALS, FISCAL ANALYSIS, FISCAL CONSTRAINT, FISCAL CONSTRAINTS, FISCAL DISCIPLINE, FISCAL FRAMEWORK, FISCAL IMPACT, FISCAL IMPLICATIONS, FISCAL PRESSURES, FISCAL STRATEGY, FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY, FISCAL TARGET, FISCAL TARGETS, FOREIGN AFFAIRS, FRAUD, GOVERNMENT ACTIONS, GOVERNMENT DECISION, GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE, GOVERNMENT POLICIES, GOVERNMENT POLICY, GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES, GOVERNMENT PRIORITY, GOVERNMENT SERVICE, GOVERNMENTAL POLICY, HEALTH CARE, INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INVESTIGATION, INVESTMENT BUDGET, JUSTICE, LAWS, LEADERSHIP, LEGAL DRAFTING, LEGAL FRAMEWORK, LEGAL REVIEW, LEGAL TEXT, LEGISLATION, LEGISLATIVE CHANGE, MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES, MEDIA, MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE, MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK, MEDIUM-TERM OBJECTIVE, MEDIUM-TERM PERSPECTIVE, MEDIUM-TERM PLANNING, MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, MINISTER, MINISTER OF FINANCE, MINISTER OF STATE, MINISTERIAL COORDINATION, MINISTERS, MINISTRY BUDGET REQUESTS, MONEY LAUNDERING, NATIONAL PLANNING, NATIONAL POLICIES, NATIONAL POLICY, NATIONAL STRATEGY, ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE, ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES, PARLIAMENTARY LAW, PARLIAMENTARY LAWS, PARLIAMENTARY RELATIONS, PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS, PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT, PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM, PERFORMANCE MEASURES, PERFORMANCE MONITORING, POLICY ANALYST, POLICY AREAS, POLICY CAPACITY, POLICY CHANGES, POLICY CHOICES, POLICY COMMITMENTS, POLICY DECISIONS, POLICY DEVELOPMENT, POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES, POLICY DOCUMENT, POLICY FORMULATION, POLICY FUNCTION, POLICY FUNCTIONS, POLICY IMPLEMENTATION, POLICY INITIATIVES, POLICY ISSUES, POLICY OBJECTIVES, POLICY PLANNING, POLICY PRIORITIES, POLICY PROCESS, POLICY PROCESSES, POLICY PROPOSALS, POLICY REFORM, POLICY REFORMS, POLICY RESPONSE, POLICY REVIEW, POLICY-MAKING, POLITICAL APPOINTEE, POLITICAL CAPITAL, POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT, POLITICAL PARTIES, POLITICAL SENSITIVITY, PRIME MINISTER, PRIME MINISTERS, PRIVATE SECTOR, PROCUREMENT, PROGRAM BUDGETING, PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION, PROGRAMS, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC DOCUMENTS, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC EXPENDITURES, PUBLIC FINANCE, PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC INVESTMENT, PUBLIC POLICY, PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES, PUBLIC SECTOR, QUALITY ASSURANCE, QUALITY CONTROL, QUALITY OF LIFE, QUALITY OF PUBLIC SPENDING, QUALITY STANDARDS, REALLOCATIONS, REFORM FATIGUE, REFORM PROCESS, REFORM PROGRAM, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, REGULATORY FUNCTIONS, REPRESENTATIVES, RESOURCE ALLOCATION, RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISIONS, RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT, SERVICE DELIVERY, SERVICE QUALITY, SOCIAL POLICY, SOCIAL PROTECTION, STATE BUDGET, STRATEGIC PLANS, STRATEGIC PRIORITIES, STRUCTURAL POLICIES, STRUCTURAL REFORM, STRUCTURAL REFORMS, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TRANSPARENCY, UNFUNDED MANDATES,
Online Access:	http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/10/17055672/romania-functional-review-center-government https://hdl.handle.net/10986/12270
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!