Investment Funds in Mass Privatization : Lessons from Russia and the Czech Republic

Investment funds play a key role in mass privatization in many transition economies. But have they lived up to expectations? The authors look at that question in the two earliest and best-known cases--Russia and the Czech Republic. The evidence is discouraging. It appears that the funds have either not been able to enhance the value of their holdings or have failed to share any gains with their investors. Dividends have been extremely low. Property rights created in a hasty attempt to depoliticize property relations are weak. And capital markets remain illiquid. Many funds have simply become holding companies rather than active portfolio investors. The initial design problems in mass privatization--asymmetric information and imperfect property rights--remain.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pistor, Katharina, Spicer, Andrew
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 1997-04
Subjects:AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS, ARBITRAGE, ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION, AUCTION, BANK GROUP, BANKING SECTOR, CAPITAL GAINS, CAPITAL MARKET, CAPITAL MARKETS, CASH FLOW, DIVIDENDS, DOMESTIC CAPITAL, DOMESTIC CAPITAL MARKETS, EMPLOYMENT, EXPLOITATION, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES, FINANCIAL MARKETS, FINANCIAL SECTOR, FOREIGN INVESTMENT, IMPLEMENTATION PHASE, INFLATION, INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES, INSIDER DEALING, INVESTMENT CAPITAL, INVESTMENT COMPANIES, INVESTMENT DECISIONS, INVESTMENT FUND, MERGERS, PORTFOLIO, PRIVATE PROPERTY, PRODUCTIVE ASSETS, PROFITABILITY, PROPERTY RIGHTS, SECONDARY MARKET, SECURITIES, SWAPS, TAXATION, TRANSITION ECONOMIES, TRANSPARENCY, TRUSTS, VALUATION DENATIONALIZATION, LIQUIDITY, INVESTMENT OPERATIONS, INVESTMENT RETURNS, INVESTMENT FUNDS, MASS PRIVATIZATION,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1997/04/694880/investment-funds-mass-privatization-lessons-russia-czech-republic
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11591
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!