Quality Assurance in Higher Education : A Comparison of Eight Systems
Quality in higher education is difficult to measure. Incentives to improve (or not) are often different for public and private institutions, and approaches to quality assurance have to be adapted to different situations. Poland is reforming its higher education institutional framework and the World Bank conducted a review, comparing strategies followed by (largely) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries with regard to quality assessment, to help the country assess educational services at its higher education institutions. Based on the research, some of the most comprehensive quality assessment frameworks for public universities were found in the Irish, Scottish and Hong Kong educational systems; for private universities, the Austrian and Swiss systems present interesting examples.
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brief biblioteca |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2010-11
|
| Subjects: | ACCREDITATION, AUDITS, CALL, EDUCATION SECTOR, EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS, FORMATIVE EVALUATIONS, HIGHER EDUCATION, HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS, HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY, LEARNING, LEARNING PROGRAMS, MANUFACTURING, PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS, PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES, PROGRAMS, PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES, QUALITY ASSESSMENT, QUALITY ASSURANCE, QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCIES, QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMS, RESEARCH PERFORMANCE, TEACHING, TRANSPARENCY, UNIVERSITY GRANTS, |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/11/14281997/quality-assurance-higher-education-comparison-eight-systems http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10148 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|