Joining criteria for harmonizing European forest available for wood supply estimates. Case studies from national forest inventories

For national and international reporting on forest available for wood supply (FAWS), harmonized data are needed. This information is required as forests provide goods for various sectors like the timber industry or the bioenergy sector. The effect of applying different thresholds to the three restriction classes (environmental, social and economic restriction) within the proposed reference definition for FAWS was evaluated. We applied the reference definition for FAWS to national data sets provided by five European National Forest Inventories using harmonized thresholds. The effects on FAWS area and growing stock were evaluated for each restriction and threshold. All countries within this study could report on protected areas. Social restrictions were not applied in any country, data on other restrictions are available but definitions vary. The application of common thresholds for restrictions proved difficult as effects vary between countries. The economic restriction is the most challenging to assess as many countries do not have corresponding data for direct calculation of, e.g.;harvesting costs. Using proxies for harvesting costs was difficult, as common thresholds may not be applied in different countries. For standardized reporting, a FAWS definition should be developed that utilizes existing, harmonized indicators to describe restrictions. © 2016 by the authors.

Bibliographic Details

Main Authors:	Fischer, C., Gasparini, P., Nylander, M., Redmond, J., Hernandez, L., Brändli, U. B., Pastor, A., Rizzo, M., Alberdi, I.
Format:	artículo biblioteca
Language:	English
Published:	Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2016
Subjects:	Forest area, Wood resources, Wood supply, Economic, Environmental, Social, Restriction,
Online Access:	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1470 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/291056
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!