Regional variation in tropical forest tree species composition in the Central African Republic : An assessment based on inventories by forest companies

Understanding how species assemblages are structured in relation to environmental variation is a central issue in community ecology. However, factors that create regional variation in relative species abundances have been little studied due to the rarity of large-scale datasets. Here, we investigated a large dataset (30 180 0.5-ha plots spread over 1 600 000 ha) gathered from forest planning inventories in the semi-deciduous forest of the south western Central African Republic. We used Correspondence Analysis and Non-Symmetric Correspondence Analysis on Instrumental Variables to analyse variation in the abundance of 73 common tree species in relation to soil type, rainfall and proximity to villages. Together, environmental variables explained 10.3% of multi-species floristic variation among plots, and the regional spatial structure almost disappeared when the effects of these variables were removed. A Trend Surface Analysis using a third order polynomial function of the geographical coordinates of the plots explained 14.5% of the floristic variation and more than 75% of this variation was explained by environmental variables. Sandy soil was the most influential factor affecting floristic composition. Residual spatial variation not explained by the environmental variables probably reflects the natural and anthropogenic history of the vegetation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rejou-Mechain, Maxime, Pélissier, Raphaël, Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie, Couteron, Pierre, Nasi, Robert, Thompson, John D.
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:F70 - Taxonomie végétale et phytogéographie, F40 - Écologie végétale, K10 - Production forestière, composition botanique, forêt tropicale, espèce, arbre, inventaire forestier, écologie, facteur du milieu, facteur édaphique, technique analytique, distribution des populations, dynamique des populations, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15945, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7887, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24174, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2467, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2594, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15617, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1513, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6113, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6111, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1433,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/546833/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/546833/1/document_546833.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!