Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.
Brazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the development of Brazil rather than liabilities. Based on available sound scientific evidence and agreement on their relevance, we strongly oppose any attempt to extinguish or weaken the maintenance of Brazil's Legal Reserves.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Artigo de periódico biblioteca |
Language: | Ingles English |
Published: |
2023-12-05
|
Subjects: | Sustentabilidade, Serviços de ecossistemas, Capital natural, Bem-estar humano, Vegetação Nativa, Biodiversidade, Legislação Florestal, Lei, Environmental sustainability, Ecosystem services, Biodiversity, Natural capital, |
Online Access: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159149 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-alice-doc-1159149 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-alice-doc-11591492023-12-05T13:11:32Z Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. METZGER, J. P. BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C. FERREIRA, J. N. FERNANDES, G. W. LIBRÁN-EMBID, F. PILLAR, V. D. PRIST, P. R. RODRIGUES, R. R. VIEIRA, I. C. G. OVERBECK, G. E. JEAN PAUL METZGER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; FELIPE LIBRÁN-EMBID, GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; PAULA R. PRIST, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RICARDO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; IMA CÉLIA G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Sustentabilidade Serviços de ecossistemas Capital natural Bem-estar humano Vegetação Nativa Biodiversidade Legislação Florestal Lei Environmental sustainability Ecosystem services Biodiversity Natural capital Brazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the development of Brazil rather than liabilities. Based on available sound scientific evidence and agreement on their relevance, we strongly oppose any attempt to extinguish or weaken the maintenance of Brazil's Legal Reserves. 2023-12-05T13:11:32Z 2023-12-05T13:11:32Z 2023-12-05 2019 Artigo de periódico Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, v. 17, n. 3, p. 91-103, July/Sep. 2019. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159149 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.07.002 Ingles en openAccess |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-alice |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA |
language |
Ingles English |
topic |
Sustentabilidade Serviços de ecossistemas Capital natural Bem-estar humano Vegetação Nativa Biodiversidade Legislação Florestal Lei Environmental sustainability Ecosystem services Biodiversity Natural capital Sustentabilidade Serviços de ecossistemas Capital natural Bem-estar humano Vegetação Nativa Biodiversidade Legislação Florestal Lei Environmental sustainability Ecosystem services Biodiversity Natural capital |
spellingShingle |
Sustentabilidade Serviços de ecossistemas Capital natural Bem-estar humano Vegetação Nativa Biodiversidade Legislação Florestal Lei Environmental sustainability Ecosystem services Biodiversity Natural capital Sustentabilidade Serviços de ecossistemas Capital natural Bem-estar humano Vegetação Nativa Biodiversidade Legislação Florestal Lei Environmental sustainability Ecosystem services Biodiversity Natural capital METZGER, J. P. BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C. FERREIRA, J. N. FERNANDES, G. W. LIBRÁN-EMBID, F. PILLAR, V. D. PRIST, P. R. RODRIGUES, R. R. VIEIRA, I. C. G. OVERBECK, G. E. Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. |
description |
Brazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the development of Brazil rather than liabilities. Based on available sound scientific evidence and agreement on their relevance, we strongly oppose any attempt to extinguish or weaken the maintenance of Brazil's Legal Reserves. |
author2 |
JEAN PAUL METZGER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; FELIPE LIBRÁN-EMBID, GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; PAULA R. PRIST, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RICARDO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; IMA CÉLIA G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. |
author_facet |
JEAN PAUL METZGER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; FELIPE LIBRÁN-EMBID, GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; PAULA R. PRIST, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RICARDO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; IMA CÉLIA G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. METZGER, J. P. BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C. FERREIRA, J. N. FERNANDES, G. W. LIBRÁN-EMBID, F. PILLAR, V. D. PRIST, P. R. RODRIGUES, R. R. VIEIRA, I. C. G. OVERBECK, G. E. |
format |
Artigo de periódico |
topic_facet |
Sustentabilidade Serviços de ecossistemas Capital natural Bem-estar humano Vegetação Nativa Biodiversidade Legislação Florestal Lei Environmental sustainability Ecosystem services Biodiversity Natural capital |
author |
METZGER, J. P. BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C. FERREIRA, J. N. FERNANDES, G. W. LIBRÁN-EMBID, F. PILLAR, V. D. PRIST, P. R. RODRIGUES, R. R. VIEIRA, I. C. G. OVERBECK, G. E. |
author_sort |
METZGER, J. P. |
title |
Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. |
title_short |
Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. |
title_full |
Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. |
title_fullStr |
Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. |
title_sort |
why brazil needs its legal reserves. |
publishDate |
2023-12-05 |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159149 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT metzgerjp whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT bustamantemmc whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT ferreirajn whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT fernandesgw whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT libranembidf whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT pillarvd whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT pristpr whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT rodriguesrr whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT vieiraicg whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves AT overbeckge whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves |
_version_ |
1792482647623073792 |