Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.

Brazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the development of Brazil rather than liabilities. Based on available sound scientific evidence and agreement on their relevance, we strongly oppose any attempt to extinguish or weaken the maintenance of Brazil's Legal Reserves.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: METZGER, J. P., BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C., FERREIRA, J. N., FERNANDES, G. W., LIBRÁN-EMBID, F., PILLAR, V. D., PRIST, P. R., RODRIGUES, R. R., VIEIRA, I. C. G., OVERBECK, G. E.
Other Authors: JEAN PAUL METZGER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; FELIPE LIBRÁN-EMBID, GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; PAULA R. PRIST, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RICARDO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; IMA CÉLIA G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL.
Format: Artigo de periódico biblioteca
Language:Ingles
English
Published: 2023-12-05
Subjects:Sustentabilidade, Serviços de ecossistemas, Capital natural, Bem-estar humano, Vegetação Nativa, Biodiversidade, Legislação Florestal, Lei, Environmental sustainability, Ecosystem services, Biodiversity, Natural capital,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159149
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-alice-doc-1159149
record_format koha
spelling dig-alice-doc-11591492023-12-05T13:11:32Z Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. METZGER, J. P. BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C. FERREIRA, J. N. FERNANDES, G. W. LIBRÁN-EMBID, F. PILLAR, V. D. PRIST, P. R. RODRIGUES, R. R. VIEIRA, I. C. G. OVERBECK, G. E. JEAN PAUL METZGER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; FELIPE LIBRÁN-EMBID, GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; PAULA R. PRIST, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RICARDO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; IMA CÉLIA G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Sustentabilidade Serviços de ecossistemas Capital natural Bem-estar humano Vegetação Nativa Biodiversidade Legislação Florestal Lei Environmental sustainability Ecosystem services Biodiversity Natural capital Brazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the development of Brazil rather than liabilities. Based on available sound scientific evidence and agreement on their relevance, we strongly oppose any attempt to extinguish or weaken the maintenance of Brazil's Legal Reserves. 2023-12-05T13:11:32Z 2023-12-05T13:11:32Z 2023-12-05 2019 Artigo de periódico Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, v. 17, n. 3, p. 91-103, July/Sep. 2019. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159149 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.07.002 Ingles en openAccess
institution EMBRAPA
collection DSpace
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-alice
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language Ingles
English
topic Sustentabilidade
Serviços de ecossistemas
Capital natural
Bem-estar humano
Vegetação Nativa
Biodiversidade
Legislação Florestal
Lei
Environmental sustainability
Ecosystem services
Biodiversity
Natural capital
Sustentabilidade
Serviços de ecossistemas
Capital natural
Bem-estar humano
Vegetação Nativa
Biodiversidade
Legislação Florestal
Lei
Environmental sustainability
Ecosystem services
Biodiversity
Natural capital
spellingShingle Sustentabilidade
Serviços de ecossistemas
Capital natural
Bem-estar humano
Vegetação Nativa
Biodiversidade
Legislação Florestal
Lei
Environmental sustainability
Ecosystem services
Biodiversity
Natural capital
Sustentabilidade
Serviços de ecossistemas
Capital natural
Bem-estar humano
Vegetação Nativa
Biodiversidade
Legislação Florestal
Lei
Environmental sustainability
Ecosystem services
Biodiversity
Natural capital
METZGER, J. P.
BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C.
FERREIRA, J. N.
FERNANDES, G. W.
LIBRÁN-EMBID, F.
PILLAR, V. D.
PRIST, P. R.
RODRIGUES, R. R.
VIEIRA, I. C. G.
OVERBECK, G. E.
Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.
description Brazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the development of Brazil rather than liabilities. Based on available sound scientific evidence and agreement on their relevance, we strongly oppose any attempt to extinguish or weaken the maintenance of Brazil's Legal Reserves.
author2 JEAN PAUL METZGER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; FELIPE LIBRÁN-EMBID, GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; PAULA R. PRIST, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RICARDO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; IMA CÉLIA G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL.
author_facet JEAN PAUL METZGER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; FELIPE LIBRÁN-EMBID, GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; PAULA R. PRIST, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RICARDO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; IMA CÉLIA G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL.
METZGER, J. P.
BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C.
FERREIRA, J. N.
FERNANDES, G. W.
LIBRÁN-EMBID, F.
PILLAR, V. D.
PRIST, P. R.
RODRIGUES, R. R.
VIEIRA, I. C. G.
OVERBECK, G. E.
format Artigo de periódico
topic_facet Sustentabilidade
Serviços de ecossistemas
Capital natural
Bem-estar humano
Vegetação Nativa
Biodiversidade
Legislação Florestal
Lei
Environmental sustainability
Ecosystem services
Biodiversity
Natural capital
author METZGER, J. P.
BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C.
FERREIRA, J. N.
FERNANDES, G. W.
LIBRÁN-EMBID, F.
PILLAR, V. D.
PRIST, P. R.
RODRIGUES, R. R.
VIEIRA, I. C. G.
OVERBECK, G. E.
author_sort METZGER, J. P.
title Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.
title_short Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.
title_full Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.
title_fullStr Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.
title_full_unstemmed Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.
title_sort why brazil needs its legal reserves.
publishDate 2023-12-05
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159149
work_keys_str_mv AT metzgerjp whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT bustamantemmc whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT ferreirajn whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT fernandesgw whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT libranembidf whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT pillarvd whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT pristpr whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT rodriguesrr whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT vieiraicg whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
AT overbeckge whybrazilneedsitslegalreserves
_version_ 1792482647623073792