Comparative ecological research and representative natural areas

In the last few years, international cooperation in the ecological sciences has tended to focus on site-specific or complementary rather than comparative projects. The time is now right for boosting comparative ecology. Such research can help ecology mature into a science more capable of prediction in time and extrapolation in space, as well as providing a sounder scientific underpinning for conservation. Three principal types of ingredients for comparative studies are proposed: first, an improved theoretical basis for planning for such studies, with two suggested approaches bases on the "fixing" either of phylogenetic stock (the gradient approache) or of environmental variables in disjunct geographical areas (the ecological analogues approach); second, typologies of comparable research areas; and third, representative sties for long-term research. Biosphere reserves have an important long-term contribution to make to different types of comparative study, in providing ecologists with representative control areas which can be compared with manipulated or distrubed sites. The design and implementation of such research should figure prominentley in the follow-up of the Minsk Congress.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 62441 DI CASTRI, F., 1187 UNESCO, París (Francia), 15962 PNUMA, Nairobi (Kenia), 31511 1. International Biosphere Reserve Congress Minsk, Byelorussia (URSS) 26 Set - 2 Oct 1983
Format: biblioteca
Published: URSS 1984
Subjects:AREAS SILVESTRES REPRESENTATIVAS,
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!